Laboratory analytical instruments (except optical) manufacturing · California

Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. NCA

Pleasanton, CA · ~28 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. NCA runs at 55% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Laboratory analytical instruments (except optical) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. NCA: 1.8 TCR = 55% of Laboratory analytical instruments (except optical) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. NCA safety composite

Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. NCA scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 1.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. NCA: 0.0 → 3.6 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 3.6 TCR · DART/TCR 2.01× in 2022

Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. NCA's TCR rose 3.6 from 0.0 in 2021 to 3.6 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 2.01× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334516 · Pleasanton, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.8 · 55% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #33/51
  • PHOTO Gilson Inc
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Gilson Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. NCA in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. NCA averages 1.8 TCR (55% of the Laboratory analytical instruments (except optical) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. NCA TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=3.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. NCA falls in its industry

213 Laboratory analytical instrume establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #33 safest of 51 Laboratory analytical instrume employers in California.

Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. NCA (28 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 133 employees and a TCR of 1.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. NCA
Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. NCA (28 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 133 employees and a TCR of 1.2

Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. NCA has fewer employees than the Laboratory analytical instruments (excep median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 3.6 3.6 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334516 · CA · Pleasanton

213 Laboratory analytical instruments (except optical) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 169 employers in Pleasanton, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Gilson Inc 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR ESPEC - CO 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. - Mid Atlantic Region 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Valco Instruments Company Inc 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Davis Ranch L.L.C. 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Steinbeck Country Produce 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harlan Family Ranch 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE KKG Equipment Company, LLC32 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 138 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 624 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pleasanton Campus 1,561 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sciens Building Solutions LLC 1,472 FTE
NAT-TCR TownePlace Suites Janesville 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Mo E & I - Plano Tx 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Paradise Valley Office Bldg A 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Jackson Therapy Partners, LLC. 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Chase Evanston 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Juice Plant 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Knoxville 072 LLc dba Two men and a truck 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE S03957 - Butterfield Station Landfill 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.