Laboratory analytical instruments (except optical) manufacturing · Illinois

Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. NCN

West Chicago, IL · ~37 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. NCN runs at 41% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Laboratory analytical instruments (except optical) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. NCN: 1.3 TCR = 41% of Laboratory analytical instruments (except optical) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. NCN safety composite

Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. NCN scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. NCN: 0.0 → 2.7 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 2.7 TCR · DART/TCR 2.01× in 2022

Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. NCN's TCR rose 2.7 from 0.0 in 2021 to 2.7 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 2.01× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334516 · West Chicago, IL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 41% of ind

  • DART 2.7 DART
  • RANK #4/5
  • PHOTO Harvard Bioscience H…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Harvard Bioscience Holliston (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. NCN in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. NCN averages 1.3 TCR (41% of the Laboratory analytical instruments (except optical) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. NCN TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=2.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. NCN falls in its industry

213 Laboratory analytical instrume establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 5 Laboratory analytical instrume employers in Illinois.

Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. NCN (37 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 133 employees and a TCR of 1.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. NCN
Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. NCN (37 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 133 employees and a TCR of 1.2

Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. NCN has fewer employees than the Laboratory analytical instruments (excep median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334516 · IL · West Chicago

213 Laboratory analytical instruments (except optical) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 123 employers in West Chicago, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Harvard Bioscience Holliston 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Newport 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Life Technologies Corporation 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR CT025 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Curtis Orchard Ltd 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tuscola 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lewis Seed Farms, Inc. - Ursa 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aurora Fleet Facility 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Jel Sert Company 830 FTE
CITY-NEAR BALL HORTICULTURAL COMPANY 713 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - SIL3 351 FTE
CITY-NEAR Siemens West Chicago 342 FTE
NAT-TCR Walt Disney World Resort Phase 1 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Zigg Design 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Champion Fire Protection Inc. 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR LockNet 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Municipio de Las Marias - Alcaldia 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hunt Valley Contractors, Inc. 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Craftsman Roofing Services 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southern Tank and Manufacturing Inc. 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.