Bonded warehousing, general merchandise · Ohio

Shippers Automotive Group

Urbana, OH · ~143 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Shippers Automotive Group runs at 37% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Bonded warehousing, general merchandise workplace, earning a grade A.

Shippers Automotive Group: 2.2 TCR = 37% of Bonded warehousing, general merchandise BLS 5.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Shippers Automotive Group safety composite

Shippers Automotive Group scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Shippers Automotive Group: 1.1 → 3.4 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 5.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.52× in 2024

Shippers Automotive Group's TCR rose 2.3 from 1.1 in 2016 to 3.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 5.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.52× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Urbana, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 2.2 · 37% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #208/556
  • PHOTO Tosca - WEST CHESTER
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~143 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tosca - WEST CHESTER (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Shippers Automotive Group in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Shippers Automotive Group averages 2.2 TCR (37% of the Bonded warehousing, general merchandise BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Shippers Automotive Group TCR series: 2016=1.1 · 2017=1 · 2018=4.8 · 2019=5.6 · 2020=0 · 2021=0.7 · 2022=0.7 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=3.4 · BLS 5.8

Where Shippers Automotive Group falls in its industry

9,477 Bonded warehousing, general me establishments

Safer than 69% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #208 safest of 556 Bonded warehousing, general me employers in Ohio.

Shippers Automotive Group (143 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Shippers Automotive Group
Shippers Automotive Group (143 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Shippers Automotive Group has more employees than the Bonded warehousing, general merchandise median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.4 1.1 3 0 0
2023 2.2 1.5 3 0 0
2022 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2021 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 5.6 2.6 13 0 0
2018 4.8 4.8 7 0 0
2017 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2016 1.1 1.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · OH · Urbana

9,477 Bonded warehousing, general merchandise employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 50 employers in Urbana, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tosca - WEST CHESTER 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Grandville DC 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Farmington Warehouse 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 40156 - CAPSTONE SUPERVALU QUINCY FL 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Messer Construction Co. - Corporate Office 143 FTE
STATE-SIZE ESI, Inc. Dayton 143 FTE
STATE-SIZE Atlas Butler Capital Services 143 FTE
STATE-SIZE SFO Vine Street 143 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rittal North America LLC 602 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nelson Tree Service LLC 555 FTE
CITY-NEAR Honeywell Aerospace - Urbana 481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nelson Tree Service, LLC 460 473 FTE
NAT-TCR RE Lewis Refrigeration, Inc 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Skilled Care of Mexia 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Rose Medical 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Schunk Xycarb Technology 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Simplex Inc 143 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bloomington Acura Subaru 143 FTE
NAT-SIZE Integrity Tree Services LLC 143 FTE
NAT-SIZE W&W|AFCO Steel Colfax 143 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.