Public warehousing and storage (except self storage), general merchandise · Texas

Shippers Warehouse-Forney

Dallas, TX · ~98 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Shippers Warehouse-Forney runs at 32% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Public warehousing and storage (except self storage), general merchandise workplace, earning a grade A.

Shippers Warehouse-Forney: 1.8 TCR = 32% of Public warehousing and storage (except self storage), general merchandise BLS 5.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Shippers Warehouse-Forney safety composite

Shippers Warehouse-Forney scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 46%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2016→2019

Shippers Warehouse-Forney injury rate improved

Shippers Warehouse-Forney's TCR fell 0.5 from 3.0 in 2016 to 2.5 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.0 TCR. In 2019, DART was 1.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=2.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Dallas, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.8 · 32% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #274/846
  • PHOTO ODW Logistics - DC11
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~98 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ODW Logistics - DC11 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Shippers Warehouse-Forney in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Shippers Warehouse-Forney averages 1.8 TCR (32% of the Public warehousing and storage (except self storage), general merchandise BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Shippers Warehouse-Forney TCR series: 2016=3 · 2018=0 · 2019=2.5 · BLS 5.8

Where Shippers Warehouse-Forney falls in its industry

9,477 Public warehousing and storage establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #274 safest of 846 Public warehousing and storage employers in Texas.

Shippers Warehouse-Forney (98 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Shippers Warehouse-Forney
Shippers Warehouse-Forney (98 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Shippers Warehouse-Forney has more employees than the Public warehousing and storage (except s median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 3.0 2.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · TX · Dallas

9,477 Public warehousing and storage (except self storage), general merchandise employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,187 employers in Dallas, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ODW Logistics - DC11 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ecolab DC Warehouse 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stewart Moving and Storage of Fayetteville 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR MICHAELS DISTRIBUTION CENTER #1 - ALLIANCE 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. - Fain/West Panhandle 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE Midland Service Center 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE Texarkana Operations 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE EL PASO TX INFO CEN 98 FTE
CITY-NEAR AECOM DCS (US Operations) 15,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rexel USA, Inc 8,356 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1 CHILDRENS MEDICAL CENTER OF DALLAS 6,147 FTE
CITY-NEAR HDQ - Headquarters 5,764 FTE
NAT-TCR Avon Lake Family Health Center 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Harbor Department 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Radia Corporate 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 630 - Boston 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hunter Keystone Peterbilt - Lancaster 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Redbird 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Anaheim Ca (Howell St) Depot 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE SFG - Hammond LA 98 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.