Skilled nursing facilities · Florida

Shoal Creek Rehabilitation Center

Crestview, FL · ~106 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
10.7
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Shoal Creek Rehabilitation Center runs at 165% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Shoal Creek Rehabilitation Center: 10.7 TCR = 165% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Shoal Creek Rehabilitation Center safety composite

Shoal Creek Rehabilitation Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 62% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.3

2016→2022

Shoal Creek Rehabilitation Center injury rate improved

Shoal Creek Rehabilitation Center's TCR fell 6.3 from 8.7 in 2016 to 2.4 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 24.0 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.22× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.7 · 2017=10.1 · 2018=11.3 · 2019=8.5 · 2020=9.9 · 2021=24.0 · 2022=2.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Crestview, FL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 10.7 · 165% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #726/809
  • PHOTO Lincolnwood Operator
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 56 inj
  • SIZE ~106 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lincolnwood Operator (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Shoal Creek Rehabilitation Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Shoal Creek Rehabilitation Center averages 10.7 TCR (165% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Shoal Creek Rehabilitation Center TCR series: 2016=8.7 · 2017=10.1 · 2018=11.3 · 2019=8.5 · 2020=9.9 · 2021=24 · 2022=2.4 · BLS 6.5

Where Shoal Creek Rehabilitation Center falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #726 safest of 809 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Florida.

Shoal Creek Rehabilitation Center (106 employees, TCR 10.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Shoal Creek Rehabilitation Center
Shoal Creek Rehabilitation Center (106 employees, TCR 10.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Shoal Creek Rehabilitation Center has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 2.4 2.4 2 0 0
2021 24.0 21.8 11 11 0
2020 9.9 8.7 8 0 0
2019 8.5 5.3 7 1 0
2018 11.3 10.2 10 0 0
2017 10.1 7.1 10 0 0
2016 8.7 5.4 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · FL · Crestview

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 36 employers in Crestview, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lincolnwood Operator 10.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dade Health & Rehab 10.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arbor Grove Village 10.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arbour Health Care Center 10.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wish Farms Cooling and Packing, LLC 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tecta America 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bryant Electric LLC 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE T&M Electric of Clay County, LLC 106 FTE
CITY-NEAR Reliance Test and Technology 848 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 944 427 FTE
CITY-NEAR 944 382 FTE
CITY-NEAR Crestview Aerospace 298 FTE
NAT-TCR HG622 10.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 4054-ABS-0017-0016-04017 10.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-SWY-0017-0017-01749 10.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 357240-Roslyn Po 10.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE 53WW - Regional Office 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE Elliott's Hardware 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE HKM Direct Market Communications, Inc 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE PHRG DET Sales & Marketing 106 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.