Harness assemblies for electronic use manufacturing · California

Shoals Technologies Group LLC - Plant 5

Poway, CA · ~54 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Shoals Technologies Group LLC - Plant 5 runs at 54% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Harness assemblies for electronic use manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Shoals Technologies Group LLC - Plant 5: 1.8 TCR = 54% of Harness assemblies for electronic use manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Shoals Technologies Group LLC - Plant 5 safety composite

Shoals Technologies Group LLC - Plant 5 scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.5

2023→2024

Shoals Technologies Group LLC - Plant 5 injury rate improved

Shoals Technologies Group LLC - Plant 5's TCR fell 3.5 from 3.5 in 2023 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 3.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=3.5 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334419 · Poway, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.8 · 54% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #25/48
  • PHOTO The Hall Company
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~54 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Hall Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Shoals Technologies Group LLC - Plant 5 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Shoals Technologies Group LLC - Plant 5 averages 1.8 TCR (54% of the Harness assemblies for electronic use manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Shoals Technologies Group LLC - Plant 5 TCR series: 2023=3.5 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Shoals Technologies Group LLC - Plant 5 falls in its industry

334 Harness assemblies for electro establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #25 safest of 48 Harness assemblies for electro employers in California.

Shoals Technologies Group LLC - Plant 5 (54 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 108 employees and a TCR of 1.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Shoals Technologies Group LLC - Plant 5
Shoals Technologies Group LLC - Plant 5 (54 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 108 employees and a TCR of 1.8

Shoals Technologies Group LLC - Plant 5 has fewer employees than the Harness assemblies for electronic use ma median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.5 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334419 · CA · Poway

334 Harness assemblies for electronic use manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 143 employers in Poway, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Hall Company 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR RS Microwave Co., Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Teledyne RCO 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR AANA - McAllen, TX 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sea Mist Farms 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harold E. Robben, Jr. 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jose Maria Perez 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pauma Valley 54 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Atomics Aeronautical Systems Inc. - Poway Campus 4,933 FTE
CITY-NEAR Geneal Atomics Facilities and Support Groups 1,169 FTE
CITY-NEAR Palomar Medical Center Poway 889 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Atomics - Poway - A15 661 FTE
NAT-TCR Green Distribution 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Ametrine, Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR McClone Construction Colorado 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Oak Crest Elementary 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE West Side Beer Distributing-Kalamazoo 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wendt Electrical Services, Inc. 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE C&C Sage, Inc. dba True Blue (San Antonio) 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE AeroMD 54 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.