Loading and unloading services at ports and harbors · Louisiana

Shore Tankering Service

Kenner, LA · ~269 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Shore Tankering Service runs at 24% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Loading and unloading services at ports and harbors workplace, earning a grade A.

Shore Tankering Service: 1.1 TCR = 24% of Loading and unloading services at ports and harbors BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Shore Tankering Service safety composite

Shore Tankering Service scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.6

2016→2024

Shore Tankering Service injury rate improved

Shore Tankering Service's TCR fell 1.6 from 2.2 in 2016 to 0.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.2 · 2017=1.2 · 2018=0.3 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=0.6 · 2023=0.8 · 2024=0.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488320 · Kenner, LA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 24% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/24
  • PHOTO Valero Port Arthur
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~269 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Valero Port Arthur (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Louisiana employers → · Look up another →

Shore Tankering Service in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Shore Tankering Service averages 1.1 TCR (24% of the Loading and unloading services at ports and harbors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Shore Tankering Service TCR series: 2016=2.2 · 2017=1.2 · 2018=0.3 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=0.6 · 2023=0.8 · 2024=0.6 · BLS 4.5

Where Shore Tankering Service falls in its industry

391 Loading and unloading services establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Louisiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 24 Loading and unloading services employers in Louisiana.

Shore Tankering Service (269 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Shore Tankering Service
Shore Tankering Service (269 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Shore Tankering Service has more employees than the Loading and unloading services at ports median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.6 0.0 2 0 0
2023 0.8 0.5 3 0 0
2022 0.6 0.0 2 0 0
2021 1.4 0.7 4 0 0
2020 1.5 1.1 4 0 0
2018 0.3 0.3 1 0 0
2017 1.2 0.4 3 0 0
2016 2.2 1.7 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488320 · LA · Kenner

391 Loading and unloading services at ports and harbors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 6,723 rated employers in Louisiana with headcount on file · 93 employers in Kenner, LA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Valero Port Arthur 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR APM Terminals 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stevedoring 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Impala Terminals Burnside 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE 4168-Bayer Luling 269 FTE
STATE-SIZE AKM LLC 269 FTE
STATE-SIZE Valero Meraux Refinery 269 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dynamic Fabrication Contractors - East Yard 269 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chateau Living Center of Kenner, LLC 4,304 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ochsner Medical Center - Kenner 990 FTE
CITY-NEAR MSYCX0745 MSY - UPS 643 FTE
CITY-NEAR Treasure Chest Casino 500 FTE
NAT-TCR Beecher, IL - 37 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Gulport Store # 604 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR School Specialty, Inc. - Greenville 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Riverside 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Critical Electric Systems Group 269 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arkansas Steel Associates, LLC 269 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plainfield Site 269 FTE
NAT-SIZE Quality Structures Inc 269 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.