Fire departments (e.g., government, volunteer (except private)) · Washington

Shoreline Fire Department

Shoreline, WA · ~162 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.4
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Shoreline Fire Department runs at 230% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Fire departments (e.g., government, volunteer (except private)) workplace, earning a grade F.

Shoreline Fire Department: 7.4 TCR = 230% of Fire departments (e.g., government, volunteer (except private)) BLS 3.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Shoreline Fire Department safety composite

Shoreline Fire Department scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 65% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 7.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.0

2021→2023

Shoreline Fire Department injury rate improved

Shoreline Fire Department's TCR fell 7.0 from 11.3 in 2021 to 4.2 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 11.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.57× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=11.3 · 2022=6.6 · 2023=4.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 922160 · Shoreline, WA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.4 · 230% of ind

  • DART 4.2 DART
  • RANK #3/28
  • PHOTO Eugene/Springfield F…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 38 inj
  • SIZE ~162 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Eugene/Springfield Fire Department 6 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Shoreline Fire Department in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Shoreline Fire Department averages 7.4 TCR (230% of the Fire departments (e.g., government, volunteer (except private)) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Shoreline Fire Department TCR series: 2021=11.3 · 2022=6.6 · 2023=4.2 · BLS 3.2

Where Shoreline Fire Department falls in its industry

793 Fire departments (e.g., govern establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 9.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 28 Fire departments (e.g., govern employers in Washington.

Shoreline Fire Department (162 employees, TCR 7.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 9.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Shoreline Fire Department
Shoreline Fire Department (162 employees, TCR 7.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 9.8

Shoreline Fire Department has more employees than the Fire departments (e.g., government, volu median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 9.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 4.2 4.2 9 1 0
2022 6.6 3.8 12 2 0
2021 11.3 7.3 17 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

922160 · WA · Shoreline

793 Fire departments (e.g., government, volunteer (except private)) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 42 employers in Shoreline, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Eugene/Springfield Fire Department 6 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fire Department 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Henry Fire Department 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rancho Santa Fe Fire Protection District 7.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE BT Bellevue 162 FTE
STATE-SIZE Smith Fire Systems 162 FTE
STATE-SIZE Milne Fruit Products, Inc. 162 FTE
STATE-SIZE THE TRUSS COMPANY AND BUILDING SUPPLY-SUMNER 162 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fircrest School 687 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fircrest 668 FTE
CITY-NEAR Washington State Department of Health (Shoreline) 447 FTE
CITY-NEAR CRISTA Ministries 432 FTE
NAT-TCR Anderson Underground, Inc. 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Lutheran Nursing Home 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Young & Bertke Air Systems Co. 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR American Bituminous Company 7.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE MPS of KY, LLC dba Westrock 162 FTE
NAT-SIZE Maco Bag Corporation 162 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bristol Care Center 162 FTE
NAT-SIZE Electra Link, Inc. Spring 162 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.