Nursing homes · New York

Shoreview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

Brooklyn, NY · ~348 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Shoreview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center runs at 49% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Nursing homes workplace, earning a grade A.

Shoreview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center: 3.2 TCR = 49% of Nursing homes BLS 6.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Shoreview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center safety composite

Shoreview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Shoreview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center held a steady TCR band

Shoreview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center's TCR held near 0.0 from 4.4 in 2016 to 4.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 4.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.14× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.4 · 2017=3.1 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=3.8 · 2021=3.4 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=2.1 · 2024=4.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Brooklyn, NY AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 3.2 · 49% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #139/616
  • PHOTO Rushville Nursing & …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 63 inj
  • SIZE ~348 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Rushville Nursing & Rehabilitation Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Shoreview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Shoreview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center averages 3.2 TCR (49% of the Nursing homes BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Shoreview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center TCR series: 2016=4.4 · 2017=3.1 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=3.8 · 2021=3.4 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=2.1 · 2024=4.4 · BLS 6.5

Where Shoreview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center falls in its industry

15,252 Nursing homes establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #139 safest of 616 Nursing homes employers in New York.

Shoreview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center (348 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Shoreview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
Shoreview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center (348 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Shoreview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center has more employees than the Nursing homes median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.4 3.6 11 0 0
2023 2.1 2.1 7 0 0
2022 2.6 1.7 5 3 0
2021 3.4 2.4 7 3 0
2020 3.8 2.5 6 3 0
2019 2.9 2.2 7 2 0
2018 1.6 1.3 4 1 0
2017 3.1 3.1 8 0 0
2016 4.4 3.9 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · NY · Brooklyn

15,252 Nursing homes employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 941 employers in Brooklyn, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Rushville Nursing & Rehabilitation Center 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cypress Glen Retirement Community 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bedford Care Center Monroe Hall, LLC 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mary Manning Walsh Nursing Home 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Donaldson Interiors 348 FTE
STATE-SIZE BPD 348 FTE
STATE-SIZE Advanced Atomization Technologies 348 FTE
STATE-SIZE Unit # 2718 348 FTE
CITY-NEAR EDI - Brooklyn 946 9,270 FTE
CITY-NEAR S & A Unified Home Care, Inc. 7,782 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maimonides Medical Center 6,641 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYU Langone Hospital - Brooklyn 5,690 FTE
NAT-TCR Koppers Somerville 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Stark Truss Co., Inc. Rensselaer, IN 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR RCV 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Central Florida Electric of Ocala, LLC 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE CCA Midwest, Inc. 348 FTE
NAT-SIZE TCCo-KCI 348 FTE
NAT-SIZE Giant Eagle #6539 348 FTE
NAT-SIZE National FL - 0804 348 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.