Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · North Carolina

Sidney Hoff

Charlotte, NC · ~67 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
9.8
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sidney Hoff runs at 151% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade D.

Sidney Hoff: 9.8 TCR = 151% of Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sidney Hoff safety composite

Sidney Hoff scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 60% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 9.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
C 4.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.7

2022→2023

Sidney Hoff injury rate improved

Sidney Hoff's TCR fell 4.7 from 12.1 in 2022 to 7.5 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 12.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.51× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=12.1 · 2023=7.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Charlotte, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 9.8 · 151% of ind

  • DART 5.0 DART
  • RANK #157/214
  • PHOTO ORAIR - PDX AIRPORT
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~67 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ORAIR - PDX AIRPORT (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Sidney Hoff in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sidney Hoff averages 9.8 TCR (151% of the Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sidney Hoff TCR series: 2022=12.1 · 2023=7.5 · BLS 6.5

Where Sidney Hoff falls in its industry

6,679 Courier services (i.e., interc establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #157 safest of 214 Courier services (i.e., interc employers in North Carolina.

Sidney Hoff (67 employees, TCR 9.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Sidney Hoff
Sidney Hoff (67 employees, TCR 9.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Sidney Hoff has fewer employees than the Courier services (i.e., intercity networ median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 7.5 5.0 3 0 0
2022 12.1 12.1 1 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · NC · Charlotte

6,679 Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ORAIR - PDX AIRPORT 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Ultimate Delivery Group S Corp 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 201710000 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 88370000 9.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cherryville Location 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mundy Maintenance and Services LLC Job #31827 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE David E. Looper & Company, Inc. 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE 6775_15699 67 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR Salmon Falls Resort 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Hyatt Place Albuquerque Airport 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Evergreen Senior Living 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Pontiac Mi 9.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Gilbane Building Company New Jersey 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Western Dairy Transport-Bryan 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Milcut Inc. 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE BWAY Sturtevant 67 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.