Private warehousing and storage (except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated) · Texas

Siemens Energy, Inc.

Deer Park, TX · ~468 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Siemens Energy, Inc. runs at 12% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Private warehousing and storage (except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated) workplace, earning a grade A.

Siemens Energy, Inc.: 0.7 TCR = 12% of Private warehousing and storage (except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated) BLS 5.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Siemens Energy, Inc. safety composite

Siemens Energy, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Siemens Energy, Inc.: 0.2 → 0.6 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 1.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.23× in 2024

Siemens Energy, Inc.'s TCR rose 0.4 from 0.2 in 2022 to 0.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 1.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.23× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493190 · Deer Park, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 12% of ind

  • DART 0.2 DART
  • RANK #12/76
  • PHOTO Big Spring Terminal
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~468 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Big Spring Terminal (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Siemens Energy, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Siemens Energy, Inc. averages 0.7 TCR (12% of the Private warehousing and storage (except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Siemens Energy, Inc. TCR series: 2022=0.2 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=0.6 · BLS 5.8

Where Siemens Energy, Inc. falls in its industry

453 Private warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 76 Private warehousing and storag employers in Texas.

Siemens Energy, Inc. (468 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Siemens Energy, Inc.
Siemens Energy, Inc. (468 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Siemens Energy, Inc. has more employees than the Private warehousing and storage (except median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.6 0.2 4 0 0
2023 1.3 0.9 7 0 0
2022 0.2 0.2 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493190 · TX · Deer Park

453 Private warehousing and storage (except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 174 employers in Deer Park, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Big Spring Terminal 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Argo Terminal 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Corpus Christi TX Term 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cranbury B598 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE C1662 - Enterprise - Frac X 468 FTE
STATE-SIZE Polk Mechanical Company- DFW 468 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dallas Beverages 468 FTE
STATE-SIZE USM Store #562 468 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Plant Service, Inc. 3,297 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Plant Services, LLC 2,807 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bilfinger Inc 1,414 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dashiell/Dacon Corporation 1,118 FTE
NAT-TCR Farmington Early Childhood Center 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR TK Elevator Oklahoma City 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Ecu Health Medical Center Es 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR D2 (Squared) Industrial Services LLC 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Multi-Craft Contractors, Inc. Springdale, AR 468 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wvcha - Charleston 468 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lashr - Shreveport 468 FTE
NAT-SIZE RQ Construction 468 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.