Day care centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities · California

Sierra Center

Oroville, CA · ~44 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sierra Center runs at 73% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Day care centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities workplace, earning a grade B.

Sierra Center: 2.8 TCR = 73% of Day care centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sierra Center safety composite

Sierra Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Sierra Center: 0.0 → 5.6 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 5.6 TCR · DART/TCR 2× in 2018

Sierra Center's TCR rose 5.6 from 0.0 in 2017 to 5.6 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Oroville, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.8 · 73% of ind

  • DART 5.6 DART
  • RANK #62/230
  • PHOTO Inv Store Inverness,…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Inv Store Inverness, FL (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Sierra Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sierra Center averages 2.8 TCR (73% of the Day care centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sierra Center TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=5.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Sierra Center falls in its industry

1,320 Day care centers for disabled establishments

Safer than 69% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #62 safest of 230 Day care centers for disabled employers in California.

Sierra Center (44 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sierra Center
Sierra Center (44 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Sierra Center has fewer employees than the Day care centers for disabled persons, t median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 5.6 5.6 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · CA · Oroville

1,320 Day care centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 79 employers in Oroville, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Inv Store Inverness, FL 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR North Carolina Outreach Home Care 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR CS Springfield 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Easter Seals Hawaii - Maui Service Center 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Firebaugh 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Boutonnet Farms 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Central Coast Vineyards 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE FESTIVAL FARMS 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 66 2,360 FTE
CITY-NEAR Oroville Hospital 1,881 FTE
CITY-NEAR Butte-Glenn Community College District 1,344 FTE
CITY-NEAR Oroville Hospital Post Acute Center 1,340 FTE
NAT-TCR West Gables Health Care Center 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR HES Duncan, OK (Plant 2) 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Faurecia - Fraser 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Chicago II 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Walker's Point 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Utica Care Center 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Northwestern College 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE dd's DISCOUNTS Store 5159 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.