MDs' (medical doctors, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) · Arizona

Sierra Vista Medical Group

Sierra Vista, AZ · ~70 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sierra Vista Medical Group runs at 281% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical MDs' (medical doctors, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) workplace, earning a grade F.

Sierra Vista Medical Group: 10.7 TCR = 281% of MDs' (medical doctors, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sierra Vista Medical Group safety composite

Sierra Vista Medical Group scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−18.2

2016→2018

Sierra Vista Medical Group injury rate improved

Sierra Vista Medical Group's TCR fell 18.2 from 18.2 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 18.2 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=18.2 · 2017=13.7 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621111 · Sierra Vista, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.7 · 281% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #30/30
  • PHOTO Allina Health Northf…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~70 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Allina Health Northfield Clinic (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Sierra Vista Medical Group in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sierra Vista Medical Group averages 10.7 TCR (281% of the MDs' (medical doctors, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sierra Vista Medical Group TCR series: 2016=18.2 · 2017=13.7 · 2018=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Sierra Vista Medical Group falls in its industry

2,836 MDs' (medical doctors, except establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #30 safest of 30 MDs' (medical doctors, except employers in Arizona.

Sierra Vista Medical Group (70 employees, TCR 10.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sierra Vista Medical Group
Sierra Vista Medical Group (70 employees, TCR 10.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Sierra Vista Medical Group has more employees than the MDs' (medical doctors, except mental hea median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 13.7 2.8 6 4 0
2016 18.2 0.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621111 · AZ · Sierra Vista

2,836 MDs' (medical doctors, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 59 employers in Sierra Vista, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Allina Health Northfield Clinic 10.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Henghold Skin Health and Surgery Group 10.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR EH MId Dakota Woman's Center 10.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Skyline Family Medicine- White Salmon 10.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Holbrook 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Phoenix Office 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mirabella 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Porter Brothers 70 FTE
CITY-NEAR CANYON VISTA MEDICAL CENTER 645 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1240 389 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1240 367 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wick Communications Co. 328 FTE
NAT-TCR B-XI Bedford LLC 10.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Senior Care At Denton Post Acute Care 10.7 TCR
NAT-TCR STCFShop 10.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Westminster Woods on Julington Creek 10.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE GNNC, Inc. dba Gosnell Therapy and Living 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE B-X Quincy LLC 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wichita Branch 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4818-48180054-3860 S. Harrmon-Wc 70 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.