Hot forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished · Ohio

SIFCO Industries, Inc.

Cleveland, OH · ~171 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

SIFCO Industries, Inc. runs at 201% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Hot forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished workplace, earning a grade F.

SIFCO Industries, Inc.: 6.6 TCR = 201% of Hot forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

SIFCO Industries, Inc. safety composite

SIFCO Industries, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 58% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.7

2016→2021

SIFCO Industries, Inc. injury rate improved

SIFCO Industries, Inc.'s TCR fell 2.7 from 5.4 in 2016 to 2.7 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 10.1 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.24× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.4 · 2017=8.3 · 2020=10.1 · 2021=2.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332111 · Cleveland, OH ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 6.6 · 201% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #28/41
  • PHOTO Western Forge & Flan…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 33 inj
  • SIZE ~171 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Western Forge & Flange Company, LLC. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

SIFCO Industries, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows SIFCO Industries, Inc. averages 6.6 TCR (201% of the Hot forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

SIFCO Industries, Inc. TCR series: 2016=5.4 · 2017=8.3 · 2020=10.1 · 2021=2.7 · BLS 3.3

Where SIFCO Industries, Inc. falls in its industry

241 Hot forgings made from purchas establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #28 safest of 41 Hot forgings made from purchas employers in Ohio.

SIFCO Industries, Inc. (171 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 5.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate SIFCO Industries, Inc.
SIFCO Industries, Inc. (171 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 5.0

SIFCO Industries, Inc. has more employees than the Hot forgings made from purchased iron or median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 2.7 1.6 2 3 0
2020 10.1 6.6 10 10 0
2017 8.3 5.3 11 3 0
2016 5.4 5.4 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332111 · OH · Cleveland

241 Hot forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 922 employers in Cleveland, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Western Forge & Flange Company, LLC. 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bonney Forge 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6086_14493 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR ATI Forged Products 6.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Custom Agri Systems Inc 171 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tremco Incorporated - Commercial Sealants (Corporate & Field) 171 FTE
STATE-SIZE West Chester, 9870 Crescent Park Drive 171 FTE
STATE-SIZE Area Energy & Electric, Inc. Sidney Branch 171 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cleveland Clinic Main Campus 25,629 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Cleveland Clinic Foundation 20,763 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cleveland Medical Center 10,377 FTE
CITY-NEAR SILCO FIRE & SECURITY - CLEVELAND 3,641 FTE
NAT-TCR Renaissance Schaumburg Convention Center Hotel 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Apex Transfer Station 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Richland Center 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Tcw, Inc Dalton 6.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Andrews Distributing- Corpus Christi Facility 171 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cerro Wire Hartselle 171 FTE
NAT-SIZE Strong Hold Products 171 FTE
NAT-SIZE San Lorenzo, Ca Tharco 171 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.