Wire, copper (e.g., armored, bare, insulated), made from purchased copper in wire drawing plants · Indiana

Sigma Wire International

Elkhart, IN · ~40 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sigma Wire International runs at 37% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Wire, copper (e.g., armored, bare, insulated), made from purchased copper in wire drawing plants workplace, earning a grade A.

Sigma Wire International: 1.2 TCR = 37% of Wire, copper (e.g., armored, bare, insulated), made from purchased copper in wire drawing plants BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sigma Wire International safety composite

Sigma Wire International scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Sigma Wire International held a steady TCR band

Sigma Wire International's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 2.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.0 · 2021=2.4 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331420 · Elkhart, IN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 37% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/23
  • PHOTO Southwire Florence P…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~40 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Southwire Florence Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Sigma Wire International in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sigma Wire International averages 1.2 TCR (37% of the Wire, copper (e.g., armored, bare, insulated), made from purchased copper in wire drawing plants BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sigma Wire International TCR series: 2018=0 · 2021=2.4 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Sigma Wire International falls in its industry

198 Wire, copper (e.g., armored, establishments

Safer than 84% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 23 Wire, copper (e.g., armored, employers in Indiana.

Sigma Wire International (40 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sigma Wire International
Sigma Wire International (40 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Sigma Wire International has fewer employees than the Wire, copper (e.g., armored, bare, insu median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2021 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331420 · IN · Elkhart

198 Wire, copper (e.g., armored, bare, insulated), made from purchased copper in wire drawing plants employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 401 employers in Elkhart, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Southwire Florence Plant 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR General Cable 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Polymettalurgical 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1 Prestolite Dr. 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Black Gold Farms 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE 320-NiSource-Chesterton IN-Bailly Gen 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Baer Field Service Center 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE IND-DWH-INDIANA 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR Forest River, Inc. 12,549 FTE
CITY-NEAR THOR MOTOR COACH 2,437 FTE
CITY-NEAR Elkhart Community Schools 1,892 FTE
CITY-NEAR HRV LLC 1,692 FTE
NAT-TCR Entergy Sterlington/Perryville Plant 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Edison Regional Response Center 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Sparkling Klean Service 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Aloft Tallahassee FL 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Helm Tool Company 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Solar Energy Solutions 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Suzanne Elise assisted living 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rockland Marine Corp 40 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.