Awnings, rigid plastics or fiberglass, manufacturing · Florida

Signature Systems Group, LLC - Orlando

Orlando, FL · ~147 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Signature Systems Group, LLC - Orlando runs at 131% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Awnings, rigid plastics or fiberglass, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Signature Systems Group, LLC - Orlando: 4.3 TCR = 131% of Awnings, rigid plastics or fiberglass, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Signature Systems Group, LLC - Orlando safety composite

Signature Systems Group, LLC - Orlando scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.9

2021→2023

Signature Systems Group, LLC - Orlando injury rate improved

Signature Systems Group, LLC - Orlando's TCR fell 3.9 from 7.0 in 2021 to 3.1 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 7.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.72× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=7.0 · 2022=2.9 · 2023=3.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Orlando, FL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.3 · 131% of ind

  • DART 3.1 DART
  • RANK #36/63
  • PHOTO CANYON PLASTICS, LLC
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~147 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CANYON PLASTICS, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Signature Systems Group, LLC - Orlando in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Signature Systems Group, LLC - Orlando averages 4.3 TCR (131% of the Awnings, rigid plastics or fiberglass, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Signature Systems Group, LLC - Orlando TCR series: 2021=7 · 2022=2.9 · 2023=3.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Signature Systems Group, LLC - Orlando falls in its industry

2,838 Awnings, rigid plastics or fib establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #36 safest of 63 Awnings, rigid plastics or fib employers in Florida.

Signature Systems Group, LLC - Orlando (147 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Signature Systems Group, LLC - Orlando
Signature Systems Group, LLC - Orlando (147 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Signature Systems Group, LLC - Orlando has more employees than the Awnings, rigid plastics or fiberglass, m median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.1 3.1 5 0 0
2022 2.9 2.1 4 0 0
2021 7.0 0.6 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · FL · Orlando

2,838 Awnings, rigid plastics or fiberglass, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,997 employers in Orlando, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CANYON PLASTICS, LLC 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR ATP - Milford Center 12740 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 0414 - Windows-Venice 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cambro Skylab 4.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE DiMare Ruskin, Inc. 147 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dundee Citrus Growers Association 147 FTE
STATE-SIZE St. Petersburg Complex 147 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dallas 1 Corporation 147 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Orlando Resort 20,343 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Parks and Resorts : UO 13,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR ADVENTHEALTH ORLANDO 11,412 FTE
CITY-NEAR Florida Hospital Orlando 10,318 FTE
NAT-TCR Western DuPage Special Recreation Association 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Mt Holly Urgent Care 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 693 - Plymouth Branch 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Dura Mark LLC 4.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE BizJet 147 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fiesta # 03 147 FTE
NAT-SIZE Zanini Tennessee, Inc. 147 FTE
NAT-SIZE 10049 Tysons 147 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.