Sheet, plastics, unlaminated (except packaging), manufacturing · Massachusetts

Sika Canton 100

Canton, MA · ~111 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sika Canton 100 runs at 48% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Sheet, plastics, unlaminated (except packaging), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Sika Canton 100: 1.6 TCR = 48% of Sheet, plastics, unlaminated (except packaging), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sika Canton 100 safety composite

Sika Canton 100 scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.9

2016→2024

Sika Canton 100 injury rate improved

Sika Canton 100's TCR fell 0.9 from 0.9 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.9 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=2.7 · 2021=0.9 · 2022=3.8 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326113 · Canton, MA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 48% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/14
  • PHOTO Berry Printing NATN …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~111 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Berry Printing NATN 428 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Sika Canton 100 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sika Canton 100 averages 1.6 TCR (48% of the Sheet, plastics, unlaminated (except packaging), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sika Canton 100 TCR series: 2016=0.9 · 2017=0 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=0 · 2020=2.7 · 2021=0.9 · 2022=3.8 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Sika Canton 100 falls in its industry

303 Sheet, plastics, unlaminated ( establishments

Safer than 69% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 14 Sheet, plastics, unlaminated ( employers in Massachusetts.

Sika Canton 100 (111 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 98 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Sika Canton 100
Sika Canton 100 (111 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 98 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Sika Canton 100 has more employees than the Sheet, plastics, unlaminated (except pac median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.5 1.7 3 1 0
2022 3.8 3.8 5 0 0
2021 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2020 2.7 2.7 3 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.6 1.7 2 1 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.9 0.9 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326113 · MA · Canton

303 Sheet, plastics, unlaminated (except packaging), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 98 employers in Canton, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Berry Printing NATN 428 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR SK microworks America 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jindal Films Americas LLC - Shawnee Films Plant 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Food Merchandising : FRANKLIN PARK 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE General Contractor 111 FTE
STATE-SIZE G.O. Construction Services, LLC 111 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lunenburg 111 FTE
STATE-SIZE Middlesex Glass Company Inc. 111 FTE
CITY-NEAR Point32Health Canton 4,420 FTE
CITY-NEAR Organogenesis (Campus: 85, 65, and 150 Dan Rd Canton Locations) 855 FTE
CITY-NEAR Organogenesis (Campus: 85, 65, and 150 Dan Rd Canton Location's) 631 FTE
CITY-NEAR E.M. Duggan, Inc. 432 FTE
NAT-TCR Bbb 11651 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Danbert, Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Peanut Butter 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Noland Lumber Company 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE WCNC, Inc. dba Katherine's Place at Wedington 111 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shickel Corporation - Bridgewater 111 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bastrop Lost Pines Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 111 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brownsville Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 111 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.