Fire sprinkler system installation · Ohio

Silco Fire & Security - Cincinnati

Cincinnati, OH · ~125 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Silco Fire & Security - Cincinnati runs at 39% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Fire sprinkler system installation workplace, earning a grade A.

Silco Fire & Security - Cincinnati: 1.1 TCR = 39% of Fire sprinkler system installation BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Silco Fire & Security - Cincinnati safety composite

Silco Fire & Security - Cincinnati scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Silco Fire & Security - Cincinnati held a steady TCR band

Silco Fire & Security - Cincinnati's TCR held near 0.2 from 0.9 in 2019 to 0.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 1.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.9 · 2020=1.7 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=1.6 · 2023=1.7 · 2024=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Cincinnati, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 39% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #41/300
  • PHOTO M&T Plumbing & Heati…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~125 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: M&T Plumbing & Heating Co., Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Silco Fire & Security - Cincinnati in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Silco Fire & Security - Cincinnati averages 1.1 TCR (39% of the Fire sprinkler system installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Silco Fire & Security - Cincinnati TCR series: 2019=0.9 · 2020=1.7 · 2021=0 · 2022=1.6 · 2023=1.7 · 2024=0.7 · BLS 2.8

Where Silco Fire & Security - Cincinnati falls in its industry

5,793 Fire sprinkler system installa establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #41 safest of 300 Fire sprinkler system installa employers in Ohio.

Silco Fire & Security - Cincinnati (125 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Silco Fire & Security - Cincinnati
Silco Fire & Security - Cincinnati (125 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Silco Fire & Security - Cincinnati has more employees than the Fire sprinkler system installation median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.7 0.0 1 0 0
2023 1.7 1.7 2 0 0
2022 1.6 0.0 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 1.7 1.7 1 1 0
2019 0.9 0.9 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · OH · Cincinnati

5,793 Fire sprinkler system installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,513 employers in Cincinnati, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR M&T Plumbing & Heating Co., Inc 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Martel HVAC 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR BT Winter Park 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dallas TX Branch 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE AKRON - WILBETH SHOP 125 FTE
STATE-SIZE Atlas Steel 125 FTE
STATE-SIZE Taylor Tele-Communications, Inc. 125 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vertiv Corporation - Lorain 125 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center 17,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Operations 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain : Evendale, OH 7,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain Evendale OH 6,400 FTE
NAT-TCR CL Benton & Sons, Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Riggs Companies 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Cholla Power Plant 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Dot Foods, Inc. Dyersburg, TN 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Giant Food Stores 6475 125 FTE
NAT-SIZE Giant 320 125 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pitman Creek Wholesale 125 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dream Nashville 125 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.