Metal cans, light gauge metal, manufacturing · Iowa

Silgan Containers Burlington

Burlington, IA · ~147 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Silgan Containers Burlington runs at 39% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Metal cans, light gauge metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Silgan Containers Burlington: 1.3 TCR = 39% of Metal cans, light gauge metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Silgan Containers Burlington safety composite

Silgan Containers Burlington scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Silgan Containers Burlington: 0.7 → 1.4 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 2.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.54× in 2024

Silgan Containers Burlington's TCR rose 0.7 from 0.7 in 2017 to 1.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 2.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.54× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332431 · Burlington, IA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 39% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #2/5
  • PHOTO Ball Tinplate 024 Ch…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~147 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ball Tinplate 024 Chestnut Hill (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Iowa employers → · Look up another →

Silgan Containers Burlington in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Silgan Containers Burlington averages 1.3 TCR (39% of the Metal cans, light gauge metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Silgan Containers Burlington TCR series: 2017=0.7 · 2018=0.7 · 2019=0.6 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=2 · 2023=0.6 · 2024=1.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Silgan Containers Burlington falls in its industry

217 Metal cans, light gauge metal, establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Iowa alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 5 Metal cans, light gauge metal, employers in Iowa.

Silgan Containers Burlington (147 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 117 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Silgan Containers Burlington
Silgan Containers Burlington (147 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 117 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Silgan Containers Burlington has more employees than the Metal cans, light gauge metal, manufactu median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.4 0.7 1 1 0
2023 0.6 0.0 1 0 0
2022 2.0 0.0 3 0 0
2021 1.9 0.0 3 0 0
2020 2.5 0.0 3 1 0
2019 0.6 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2017 0.7 0.7 0 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332431 · IA · Burlington

217 Metal cans, light gauge metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,192 rated employers in Iowa with headcount on file · 68 employers in Burlington, IA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ball Tinplate 024 Chestnut Hill 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc. - Dayton Plant 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ball Beverage Pkg 192 Monticello 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc. - Winchester Plant 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Russell Construction 147 FTE
STATE-SIZE Michels Power- IA 147 FTE
STATE-SIZE LS - DYERSVILLE-TRUSS 147 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plant 05 - DM 147 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shearer's Foods - BUR 727 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shearer's Foods Burlington 719 FTE
CITY-NEAR Federal-Mogul Ignition Company Burlington Iowa Plant 576 FTE
CITY-NEAR CNH_Burlington 576 FTE
NAT-TCR The Potato King, Inc. 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Marvin Windows and Doors - Grafton 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR JLG - Orrville 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Lakehead Constructors, Inc. 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE MCPS-Moses Cone Physician Svc Inc 147 FTE
NAT-SIZE Glen Island Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation 147 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mc Kau 147 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0692 Brentwood 147 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.