Awnings, rigid plastics or fiberglass, manufacturing · Arkansas

Silgan Plastic Food Containers

Fort Smith, AR · ~80 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Silgan Plastic Food Containers runs at 51% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Awnings, rigid plastics or fiberglass, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Silgan Plastic Food Containers: 1.7 TCR = 51% of Awnings, rigid plastics or fiberglass, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Silgan Plastic Food Containers safety composite

Silgan Plastic Food Containers scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 47%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Silgan Plastic Food Containers: 0.0 → 1.8 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 3.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.07× in 2020

Silgan Plastic Food Containers's TCR rose 1.8 from 0.0 in 2018 to 1.8 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.3 TCR. In 2020, DART was 1.07× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Fort Smith, AR AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.7 · 51% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #11/30
  • PHOTO Go Plastics
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~80 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Go Plastics (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arkansas employers → · Look up another →

Silgan Plastic Food Containers in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Silgan Plastic Food Containers averages 1.7 TCR (51% of the Awnings, rigid plastics or fiberglass, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Silgan Plastic Food Containers TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=3.3 · 2020=1.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Silgan Plastic Food Containers falls in its industry

2,838 Awnings, rigid plastics or fib establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arkansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 30 Awnings, rigid plastics or fib employers in Arkansas.

Silgan Plastic Food Containers (80 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Silgan Plastic Food Containers
Silgan Plastic Food Containers (80 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Silgan Plastic Food Containers has fewer employees than the Awnings, rigid plastics or fiberglass, m median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 1.8 1.8 2 0 0
2019 3.3 3.3 4 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · AR · Fort Smith

2,838 Awnings, rigid plastics or fiberglass, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,393 rated employers in Arkansas with headcount on file · 249 employers in Fort Smith, AR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Go Plastics 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR ORBIS Monticello 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR ArmstrongFlooring, Inc. Jackson MS 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cornerstone Building Brands 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Benton County Foods LLC 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Arkansas Electric Cooperative - Salem 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Valley View Agri 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hendren Plastics, Inc. 80 FTE
CITY-NEAR MERCY HOSPITAL FORT SMITH 1,944 FTE
CITY-NEAR ABB Motors and Mechanical, Inc. - Fort Smith 1,298 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fort Smith - 5713 RS Boreham Jr Street 985 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Health Medical Center - Fort Smith 970 FTE
NAT-TCR Bonitz Flooring and Contracting Greenville 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 810 Purple Cow Creamery 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Greens Bayou Plant 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Cardinal IG - Fremont IG 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Landing at Willow Grove 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE ARaymond Tinnerman Industrial 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE CT-Open 3/21/11 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Axel Royal OK 80 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.