Wafers (semiconductor devices) manufacturing · Oregon

Siltronic Corporation

Portland, OR · ~386 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Siltronic Corporation runs at 45% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Wafers (semiconductor devices) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Siltronic Corporation: 1.5 TCR = 45% of Wafers (semiconductor devices) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Siltronic Corporation safety composite

Siltronic Corporation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 1.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Siltronic Corporation held a steady TCR band

Siltronic Corporation's TCR held near 0.0 from 1.2 in 2016 to 1.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 2.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.2 · 2018=1.4 · 2019=1.3 · 2020=1.2 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=1.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334413 · Portland, OR AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.5 · 45% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #11/19
  • PHOTO NeoPhotonics Fremont
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 40 inj
  • SIZE ~386 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NeoPhotonics Fremont (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Siltronic Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Siltronic Corporation averages 1.5 TCR (45% of the Wafers (semiconductor devices) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Siltronic Corporation TCR series: 2016=1.2 · 2018=1.4 · 2019=1.3 · 2020=1.2 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=1.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Siltronic Corporation falls in its industry

437 Wafers (semiconductor devices) establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 19 Wafers (semiconductor devices) employers in Oregon.

Siltronic Corporation (386 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 216 employees and a TCR of 0.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Siltronic Corporation
Siltronic Corporation (386 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 216 employees and a TCR of 0.9

Siltronic Corporation has more employees than the Wafers (semiconductor devices) manufactu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.2 0.6 4 0 0
2023 1.1 0.9 3 1 0
2022 2.6 2.6 9 1 0
2021 1.9 0.8 6 1 0
2020 1.2 0.6 4 0 0
2019 1.3 0.6 4 0 0
2018 1.4 0.7 5 1 0
2016 1.2 0.7 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334413 · OR · Portland

437 Wafers (semiconductor devices) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 1,728 employers in Portland, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NeoPhotonics Fremont 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Yerico Manufacturing Inc 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR nLIGHT 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Microchip Gresham 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE TriMet Merlo Operations Facility 386 FTE
STATE-SIZE FedEx 5159 NE CORNFOOT RD 387 FTE
STATE-SIZE Monrovia Nursery 388 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vigor Marine LLC 388 FTE
CITY-NEAR OHSU Main Campus 18,003 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR349 PROVIDENCE ST VINCENT MEDICAL CTR-PORTLA 4,033 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR346 PROVIDENCE PORTLAND MEDICAL CTR-PORTLAND 3,684 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000530 3,498 FTE
NAT-TCR Bowling Green Flight Center 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR G.E. Marshall, Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Layton Facility 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Revere Electric Supply Peru 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE ACTS Retirement-Life Communities - Matthews Glen 386 FTE
NAT-SIZE WellSpan Specialty Services 386 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lockheed Martin Corporation US PA King of Prussia Mall Blv (1028) 386 FTE
NAT-SIZE Commerce Distribution Center Warehouse 386 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.