Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) · Florida

Silver Wings Aerospace

Princeton, FL · ~119 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Silver Wings Aerospace runs at 40% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) workplace, earning a grade A.

Silver Wings Aerospace: 1.8 TCR = 40% of Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Silver Wings Aerospace safety composite

Silver Wings Aerospace scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2022→2024

Silver Wings Aerospace injury rate improved

Silver Wings Aerospace's TCR fell 1.3 from 2.1 in 2022 to 0.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 2.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=2.1 · 2023=2.6 · 2024=0.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488190 · Princeton, FL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.8 · 40% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #48/137
  • PHOTO TXSTI - SAN ANTONIO …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~119 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TXSTI - SAN ANTONIO GATEWAY (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Silver Wings Aerospace in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Silver Wings Aerospace averages 1.8 TCR (40% of the Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Silver Wings Aerospace TCR series: 2022=2.1 · 2023=2.6 · 2024=0.8 · BLS 4.5

Where Silver Wings Aerospace falls in its industry

992 Aircraft maintenance and repai establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #48 safest of 137 Aircraft maintenance and repai employers in Florida.

Silver Wings Aerospace (119 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Silver Wings Aerospace
Silver Wings Aerospace (119 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Silver Wings Aerospace has more employees than the Aircraft maintenance and repair services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2023 2.6 0.0 2 1 0
2022 2.1 2.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488190 · FL · Princeton

992 Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 6 employers in Princeton, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TXSTI - SAN ANTONIO GATEWAY 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Learjet Inc. - Dallas Service Center 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Trace Aviation 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR SFS San Antonio, TX-074SAT 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE PRECO 119 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rapid Response Team Jacksonville 119 FTE
STATE-SIZE CORE Construction Services of Florida, LLC 119 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lanzo Construction Co., FL 119 FTE
CITY-NEAR CH6 New Limeco,LLC 53 FTE
CITY-NEAR 114052-HOM-PRINCETON BR 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR Princeton 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR Landscaping Associates Inc 36 FTE
NAT-TCR Wood Stone 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Englert Inc 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Emerson EWP 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 1422 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE FXI, Inc. - Santa Teresa 119 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alcan Electrical & Engineering, Inc. 119 FTE
NAT-SIZE Margaritaville St Thomas 119 FTE
NAT-SIZE E-J Electric, LLC 119 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.