Skilled nursing facilities · Ohio

Silverton Pointe Nursing and Rehabilitation

Cincinnati, OH · ~109 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
4.3
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Silverton Pointe Nursing and Rehabilitation runs at 66% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade B.

Silverton Pointe Nursing and Rehabilitation: 4.3 TCR = 66% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Silverton Pointe Nursing and Rehabilitation safety composite

Silverton Pointe Nursing and Rehabilitation scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.3

2016→2017

Silverton Pointe Nursing and Rehabilitation injury rate improved

Silverton Pointe Nursing and Rehabilitation's TCR fell 4.3 from 6.5 in 2016 to 2.2 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.5 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.5 · 2017=2.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Cincinnati, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 4.3 · 66% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #332/1074
  • PHOTO Van Buren Health and…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~109 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Van Buren Health and Rehabilitation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Silverton Pointe Nursing and Rehabilitation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Silverton Pointe Nursing and Rehabilitation averages 4.3 TCR (66% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Silverton Pointe Nursing and Rehabilitation TCR series: 2016=6.5 · 2017=2.2 · BLS 6.5

Where Silverton Pointe Nursing and Rehabilitation falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #332 safest of 1074 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Ohio.

Silverton Pointe Nursing and Rehabilitation (109 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Silverton Pointe Nursing and Rehabilitation
Silverton Pointe Nursing and Rehabilitation (109 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Silverton Pointe Nursing and Rehabilitation has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 2.2 0.0 2 0 0
2016 6.5 1.3 4 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · OH · Cincinnati

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,513 employers in Cincinnati, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Van Buren Health and Rehabilitation 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heartland Health Care and Rehab Center of Boca Raton 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arbor Court 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Beecher Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 4.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Divine Rehabilitation and Nursing at Sylvania 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lake Erie Crushers Stadium 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE Huntington Court 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE Terrace View Gardens 109 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center 17,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Operations 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain : Evendale, OH 7,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain Evendale OH 6,400 FTE
NAT-TCR 0208 - Winston-Salem, Nc 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 49961 - Hawaii Fac. 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Nursing care Facility 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Mobile (Almbe) 4.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rai Mx Ind 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE Riverview Manor Health Care Center 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stop & Shop 100500 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE Avante at Concord 109 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.