Roofing contractors · Louisiana

Simon Roofing and Sheet Metal - Baton Rouge

Gonzales, LA · ~32 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Simon Roofing and Sheet Metal - Baton Rouge runs at 128% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Roofing contractors workplace, earning a grade D.

Simon Roofing and Sheet Metal - Baton Rouge: 3.6 TCR = 128% of Roofing contractors BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Simon Roofing and Sheet Metal - Baton Rouge safety composite

Simon Roofing and Sheet Metal - Baton Rouge scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Simon Roofing and Sheet Metal - Baton Rouge: 0.0 → 8.1 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 11.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2022

Simon Roofing and Sheet Metal - Baton Rouge's TCR rose 8.1 from 0.0 in 2016 to 8.1 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 11.2 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238160 · Gonzales, LA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.6 · 128% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #11/14
  • PHOTO All-South Subcontrac…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: All-South Subcontractors Birmingham (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Louisiana employers → · Look up another →

Simon Roofing and Sheet Metal - Baton Rouge in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Simon Roofing and Sheet Metal - Baton Rouge averages 3.6 TCR (128% of the Roofing contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Simon Roofing and Sheet Metal - Baton Rouge TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=5.8 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=11.2 · 2021=0 · 2022=8.1 · BLS 2.8

Where Simon Roofing and Sheet Metal - Baton Rouge falls in its industry

1,723 Roofing contractors establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Louisiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 14 Roofing contractors employers in Louisiana.

Simon Roofing and Sheet Metal - Baton Rouge (32 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Simon Roofing and Sheet Metal - Baton Rouge
Simon Roofing and Sheet Metal - Baton Rouge (32 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Simon Roofing and Sheet Metal - Baton Rouge has fewer employees than the Roofing contractors median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 8.1 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 11.2 11.2 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 5.8 5.8 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238160 · LA · Gonzales

1,723 Roofing contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 6,723 rated employers in Louisiana with headcount on file · 91 employers in Gonzales, LA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR All-South Subcontractors Birmingham 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Garabar Inc 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Central Roofing 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jolly Roofing & Contracting Company Overall 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE CORE Boiler & Mechanical Services 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Measurement Technologies, Inc. 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Entergy - Lake Charles Power Station 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Entergy - J. Wayne Leonard Power Station 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR Specialty Welding and Turnarounds, LLC 2,051 FTE
CITY-NEAR 532 511 FTE
CITY-NEAR Smith Tank & Steel, Inc. 450 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 532 435 FTE
NAT-TCR Small Parts Inc. 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR FRP Sheet Metal Contracting Corp 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Cullman 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR McLeod Health Clarendon 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bryan, Texas 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Neurology Consultants 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Loving Care Hospice, Inc. 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Landoll Corporation, ICON 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.