Roofing contractors · Florida

Simon Roofing and Sheet Metal Corp - Tampa-003

Tampa, FL · ~45 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.1
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Simon Roofing and Sheet Metal Corp - Tampa-003 runs at 183% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Roofing contractors workplace, earning a grade D.

Simon Roofing and Sheet Metal Corp - Tampa-003: 5.1 TCR = 183% of Roofing contractors BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Simon Roofing and Sheet Metal Corp - Tampa-003 safety composite

Simon Roofing and Sheet Metal Corp - Tampa-003 scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.1

2016→2019

Simon Roofing and Sheet Metal Corp - Tampa-003 injury rate improved

Simon Roofing and Sheet Metal Corp - Tampa-003's TCR fell 5.1 from 5.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 10.6 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.1 · 2017=10.6 · 2018=4.8 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238160 · Tampa, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.1 · 183% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #151/251
  • PHOTO NY
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~45 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NY (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Simon Roofing and Sheet Metal Corp - Tampa-003 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Simon Roofing and Sheet Metal Corp - Tampa-003 averages 5.1 TCR (183% of the Roofing contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Simon Roofing and Sheet Metal Corp - Tampa-003 TCR series: 2016=5.1 · 2017=10.6 · 2018=4.8 · 2019=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Simon Roofing and Sheet Metal Corp - Tampa-003 falls in its industry

1,723 Roofing contractors establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #151 safest of 251 Roofing contractors employers in Florida.

Simon Roofing and Sheet Metal Corp - Tampa-003 (45 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Simon Roofing and Sheet Metal Corp - Tampa-003
Simon Roofing and Sheet Metal Corp - Tampa-003 (45 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Simon Roofing and Sheet Metal Corp - Tampa-003 has more employees than the Roofing contractors median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 4.8 4.8 1 0 0
2017 10.6 0.0 2 0 0
2016 5.1 5.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238160 · FL · Tampa

1,723 Roofing contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,659 employers in Tampa, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NY 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR MAXIM ROOFING COMPANY, LLC 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2341_4277 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Boak & Sons, Inc. 5.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Deseret Cattle & Timber 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE FM2 Ft Myers Service Center 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Flagler Service Center 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE St Lucie Service Center 45 FTE
CITY-NEAR Diversified Maintenance Systems LLC 10,600 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tampa General Hospital 7,849 FTE
CITY-NEAR Valet Living, LLC 6,337 FTE
CITY-NEAR ST. Joseph's Hospital (5100) 5,540 FTE
NAT-TCR Bio-Blood Components - Griffith, IN 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Community Support Services 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-Swy 0005 1928 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Wendy's Store #199 5.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kingsburg Apple Partners, LP 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stericycle Environmental Solutions - Hatfield,PA-2869 Sandstone 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stericycle Environmental Solutions - Blaine,MN 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Piedmont Graphics, Inc 45 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.