Other Justice Public Order and Safety Activities · Iowa

Sioux City Communications Center

Sioux City, IA · ~27 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sioux City Communications Center runs at 101% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Other Justice Public Order and Safety Activities workplace, earning a grade C.

Sioux City Communications Center: 3.2 TCR = 101% of Other Justice Public Order and Safety Activities BLS 3.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sioux City Communications Center safety composite

Sioux City Communications Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 55%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

Fatalities
C 0

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Sioux City Communications Center held a steady TCR band

Sioux City Communications Center's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 8.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=0.0 · 2022=8.6 · 2023=4.4 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 922190 · Sioux City, IA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.2 · 101% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/6
  • PHOTO Communications Center
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Communications Center (0.3 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Iowa employers → · Look up another →

Sioux City Communications Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sioux City Communications Center averages 3.2 TCR (101% of the Other Justice Public Order and Safety Activities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sioux City Communications Center TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=8.6 · 2023=4.4 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.2

Where Sioux City Communications Center falls in its industry

79 Other Justice Public Order and establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Iowa alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 6 Other Justice Public Order and employers in Iowa.

Sioux City Communications Center (27 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 5.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Sioux City Communications Center
Sioux City Communications Center (27 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 5.3

Sioux City Communications Center has fewer employees than the Other Justice Public Order and Safety Ac median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 4.4 4.4 1 0 0
2022 8.6 8.6 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

922190 · IA · Sioux City

79 Other Justice Public Order and Safety Activities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,192 rated employers in Iowa with headcount on file · 259 employers in Sioux City, IA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Communications Center 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sheriff Court Operations 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Franklin County Law Enforcement Center 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR San Joaquin County Department of Child Support Services 3.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE 2520-Storm Lake, IA (Monsanto Co.) 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wastewater Treatment Plant 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Quality Construction Services, Inc. 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Weitz Company - Mission Critical - Microsoft DSM 14 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR Seaboard Triumph Foods 2,375 FTE
CITY-NEAR SeaboardTriumph Foods 1,896 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Luke's Regional Medical Center 1,201 FTE
CITY-NEAR Smithfield Packaged Meats Corp 691 FTE
NAT-TCR Boxout, LLC Jacksonville 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR James Hardie Wax 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Grady Starbucks 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Sales-OOS 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Vandalia Avenue 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE COD040 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE TNK002 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lincoln Rural Fire Protection District 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.