Dimension lumber, hardwood, resawing purchased lumber · California

Siskiyou Forest Products

Anderson, CA · ~52 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Siskiyou Forest Products runs at 286% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Dimension lumber, hardwood, resawing purchased lumber workplace, earning a grade F.

Siskiyou Forest Products: 9.4 TCR = 286% of Dimension lumber, hardwood, resawing purchased lumber BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Siskiyou Forest Products safety composite

Siskiyou Forest Products scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Siskiyou Forest Products: 1.7 → 5.6 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 20.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.59× in 2024

Siskiyou Forest Products's TCR rose 3.9 from 1.7 in 2017 to 5.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 20.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.59× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321912 · Anderson, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.4 · 286% of ind

  • DART 5.6 DART
  • RANK #7/10
  • PHOTO Lewis & Hockenberry,…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 31 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lewis & Hockenberry, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Siskiyou Forest Products in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Siskiyou Forest Products averages 9.4 TCR (286% of the Dimension lumber, hardwood, resawing purchased lumber BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Siskiyou Forest Products TCR series: 2017=1.7 · 2018=6.3 · 2019=12.3 · 2020=20.6 · 2021=9.3 · 2022=2.1 · 2023=17.6 · 2024=5.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Siskiyou Forest Products falls in its industry

178 Dimension lumber, hardwood, re establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 10 Dimension lumber, hardwood, re employers in California.

Siskiyou Forest Products (52 employees, TCR 9.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Siskiyou Forest Products
Siskiyou Forest Products (52 employees, TCR 9.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Siskiyou Forest Products has more employees than the Dimension lumber, hardwood, resawing pur median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.6 5.6 2 0 0
2023 17.6 15.1 6 1 0
2022 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2021 9.3 3.7 5 0 0
2020 20.6 15.5 6 6 0
2019 12.3 8.8 6 1 0
2018 6.3 6.3 4 0 0
2017 1.7 1.7 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321912 · CA · Anderson

178 Dimension lumber, hardwood, resawing purchased lumber employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 39 employers in Anderson, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lewis & Hockenberry, Inc. 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Catawissa Wood and Components, Inc 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR JFM International 9.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bryan Lumber Remanufacturing, Inc. 9.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Phil Foster Ranch 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oceano Packing Company 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Pacific Farming | Citrus Farming | Ivanhoe 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brassfield Estate Vineyard 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR LinkUs Enterprises, LLC 366 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 5133 347 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5133 332 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sierra Pacific Industries 302 FTE
NAT-TCR The Commons 9.4 TCR
NAT-TCR EL-VI Farms,LLC 9.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Vermont Creamery 9.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 402c-Cares-402 Wesley Avenue 9.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE BACA Systems 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Embassy Suites North Canton 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Winnebago Foundry Inc 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Playtime 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.