Group homes for the disabled with nursing care · Virginia

Sitter & Barfoot Veterans Care Center

Richmond, VA · ~329 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
20.0
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sitter & Barfoot Veterans Care Center runs at 308% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Group homes for the disabled with nursing care workplace, earning a grade F.

Sitter & Barfoot Veterans Care Center: 20.0 TCR = 308% of Group homes for the disabled with nursing care BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sitter & Barfoot Veterans Care Center safety composite

Sitter & Barfoot Veterans Care Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 20.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−26.3

2016→2018

Sitter & Barfoot Veterans Care Center injury rate improved

Sitter & Barfoot Veterans Care Center's TCR fell 26.3 from 33.2 in 2016 to 6.9 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 33.2 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.34× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=33.2 · 2018=6.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Richmond, VA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 20.0 · 308% of ind

  • DART 6.9 DART
  • RANK #331/343
  • PHOTO Continuing Healthcar…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 85 inj
  • SIZE ~329 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Continuing Healthcare of Niles (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Sitter & Barfoot Veterans Care Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sitter & Barfoot Veterans Care Center averages 20.0 TCR (308% of the Group homes for the disabled with nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sitter & Barfoot Veterans Care Center TCR series: 2016=33.2 · 2018=6.9 · BLS 6.5

Where Sitter & Barfoot Veterans Care Center falls in its industry

15,252 Group homes for the disabled w establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #331 safest of 343 Group homes for the disabled w employers in Virginia.

Sitter & Barfoot Veterans Care Center (329 employees, TCR 20.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Sitter & Barfoot Veterans Care Center
Sitter & Barfoot Veterans Care Center (329 employees, TCR 20.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Sitter & Barfoot Veterans Care Center has more employees than the Group homes for the disabled with nursin median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 6.9 6.9 21 0 0
2016 33.2 14.1 64 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · VA · Richmond

15,252 Group homes for the disabled with nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 939 employers in Richmond, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Continuing Healthcare of Niles 20.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Smithtown Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing Care 20.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Quality Life Services - Apollo 20.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR OR OPS, INC. dba Oak Ridge Health and Rehabilitation 20.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Carvana Chesterfield 329 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 1301 329 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1344 329 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Age Protection, Inc. 329 FTE
CITY-NEAR VCU Health System 14,536 FTE
CITY-NEAR Virginia Commonwealth University 11,826 FTE
CITY-NEAR VCU 5,271 FTE
CITY-NEAR CJW Medical Center 3,259 FTE
NAT-TCR Val 37 20.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Tahoe Truckee Unified School District 20.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Columbia Cottage Linglestown 20.0 TCR
NAT-TCR H.A.N.S.L Delivery Service Inc. 20.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE LAX Gatway 329 FTE
NAT-SIZE Denver (GH) 329 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bonnet Creek - Resort 329 FTE
NAT-SIZE SmartPractice 329 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.