Booster pumping station, natural gas transportation · Michigan

Six Lakes Service Center

Six Lakes, MI · ~26 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.3
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Six Lakes Service Center runs at 73% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Booster pumping station, natural gas transportation workplace, earning a grade B.

Six Lakes Service Center: 3.3 TCR = 73% of Booster pumping station, natural gas transportation BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Six Lakes Service Center safety composite

Six Lakes Service Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.7

2016→2024

Six Lakes Service Center injury rate improved

Six Lakes Service Center's TCR fell 3.7 from 3.7 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 10.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.7 · 2017=10.9 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=9.4 · 2022=5.6 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 486210 · Six Lakes, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 3.3 · 73% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #14/14
  • PHOTO Underground Storage
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Underground Storage (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Six Lakes Service Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Six Lakes Service Center averages 3.3 TCR (73% of the Booster pumping station, natural gas transportation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Six Lakes Service Center TCR series: 2016=3.7 · 2017=10.9 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=9.4 · 2022=5.6 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Six Lakes Service Center falls in its industry

56 Booster pumping station, natur establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 14 Booster pumping station, natur employers in Michigan.

Six Lakes Service Center (26 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 79 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Six Lakes Service Center
Six Lakes Service Center (26 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 79 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Six Lakes Service Center has fewer employees than the Booster pumping station, natural gas tra median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 5.6 0.0 1 0 0
2021 9.4 4.7 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 10.9 7.3 2 1 0
2016 3.7 3.7 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

486210 · MI · Six Lakes

56 Booster pumping station, natural gas transportation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Underground Storage 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Penn Leidy - East 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Okarche C&M Office 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Virginia - South 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Walther Farms Cass City 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE United States Gypsum 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Genesee Power Station 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bronson SC 26 FTE
NAT-TCR Elkhorn Valley Packing Wellington 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Richmond Medical Center 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Portage Medical Center 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Cherry Point SC Yard 3.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cromwell Plumbing 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bangor - Terminal 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fitchburg 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Big Horn Masonry office 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.