General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) · New Jersey

SJ Transportation Co., Inc.

Woodstown, NJ · ~84 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

SJ Transportation Co., Inc. runs at 36% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) workplace, earning a grade A.

SJ Transportation Co., Inc.: 1.6 TCR = 36% of General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS 4.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

SJ Transportation Co., Inc. safety composite

SJ Transportation Co., Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

SJ Transportation Co., Inc.: 0.7 → 1.5 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 2.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.94× in 2023

SJ Transportation Co., Inc.'s TCR rose 0.8 from 0.7 in 2019 to 1.5 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 2.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.94× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484121 · Woodstown, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 36% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #11/41
  • PHOTO Melrose Park, IL - P…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~84 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Melrose Park, IL - Proviso Drive (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

SJ Transportation Co., Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows SJ Transportation Co., Inc. averages 1.6 TCR (36% of the General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

SJ Transportation Co., Inc. TCR series: 2019=0.7 · 2020=1.7 · 2021=2.5 · 2022=1.6 · 2023=1.5 · BLS 4.5

Where SJ Transportation Co., Inc. falls in its industry

3,252 General freight trucking, long establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 41 General freight trucking, long employers in New Jersey.

SJ Transportation Co., Inc. (84 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate SJ Transportation Co., Inc.
SJ Transportation Co., Inc. (84 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0

SJ Transportation Co., Inc. has more employees than the General freight trucking, long-distance, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.5 1.5 2 0 0
2022 1.6 1.6 2 0 0
2021 2.5 1.7 2 1 0
2020 1.7 1.7 2 0 0
2019 0.7 0.7 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484121 · NJ · Woodstown

3,252 General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 12 employers in Woodstown, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Melrose Park, IL - Proviso Drive 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ryder TJX 6371 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dixon Bros Inc,. 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Silver Arrow Express 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE prysmian group 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE Michael J. Wright Construction Company, Inc. 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE TK Elevator Edison 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allspec Construction, Inc. 84 FTE
CITY-NEAR REPC - PA 639 FTE
CITY-NEAR REPC - NJ 289 FTE
CITY-NEAR B.R. Williams Inc. 210 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5472-000007920 104 FTE
NAT-TCR 016 Charlotte NC 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR G&H Diversified Manufacturing 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Groendyke Transport - Fort Worth 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Zoetis Chicago Heights Plant 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Positronic Campbell Facility 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Napa Memphis DC 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atlantic Specialty Care 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Information Providers - MN 84 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.