Warehousing and storage, general merchandise · Minnesota

SJF Material Handling Inc

Winsted, MN · ~30 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.5
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

SJF Material Handling Inc runs at 268% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Warehousing and storage, general merchandise workplace, earning a grade F.

SJF Material Handling Inc: 15.5 TCR = 268% of Warehousing and storage, general merchandise BLS 5.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

SJF Material Handling Inc safety composite

SJF Material Handling Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−21.3

2016→2024

SJF Material Handling Inc injury rate improved

SJF Material Handling Inc's TCR fell 21.3 from 27.5 in 2016 to 6.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 27.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=27.5 · 2017=24.0 · 2018=27.1 · 2019=16.6 · 2020=19.2 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=12.8 · 2023=6.3 · 2024=6.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Winsted, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.5 · 268% of ind

  • DART 3.1 DART
  • RANK #81/83
  • PHOTO Stone Mountain (Ston…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 42 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Stone Mountain (Stone Ridge Drive) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

SJF Material Handling Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows SJF Material Handling Inc averages 15.5 TCR (268% of the Warehousing and storage, general merchandise BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

SJF Material Handling Inc TCR series: 2016=27.5 · 2017=24 · 2018=27.1 · 2019=16.6 · 2020=19.2 · 2021=0 · 2022=12.8 · 2023=6.3 · 2024=6.2 · BLS 5.8

Where SJF Material Handling Inc falls in its industry

9,477 Warehousing and storage, gener establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #81 safest of 83 Warehousing and storage, gener employers in Minnesota.

SJF Material Handling Inc (30 employees, TCR 15.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate SJF Material Handling Inc
SJF Material Handling Inc (30 employees, TCR 15.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

SJF Material Handling Inc has fewer employees than the Warehousing and storage, general merchan median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.2 3.1 2 0 0
2023 6.3 6.3 2 0 0
2022 12.8 0.0 4 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 19.2 6.4 6 0 0
2019 16.6 3.3 5 0 0
2018 27.1 6.8 8 0 0
2017 24.0 6.9 7 0 0
2016 27.5 10.3 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · MN · Winsted

9,477 Warehousing and storage, general merchandise employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 19 employers in Winsted, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Stone Mountain (Stone Ridge Drive) 15.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - KRB7 15.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4186-DC206 15.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 980914 15.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Nelson Nursery 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Northern Plains Dairy 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE United Dairy, Westland Dairy 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pipestone Grow Finish 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR Littfin Truss Co 226 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tetra Pak Processing Equipment Inc - Winsted 193 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tetra Pak Processing Equipment Inc 170 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tetra Pak Inc. - Winsted 103 FTE
NAT-TCR Jim Fisher Roofing & Construction, Inc. 15.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Sheridan 15.5 TCR
NAT-TCR GT Manufacturing LLC 15.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Liberty Commons Rehabilitation Center 15.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Adrian Facility 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE LRK 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE TAL 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE M. Potteiger Inc. 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.