Electricity generating plant (except hydroelectric) construction · New York

Skanska Burns McDonnell ECCO - CPV Valley

Middletown, NY · ~286 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Skanska Burns McDonnell ECCO - CPV Valley runs at 53% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Electricity generating plant (except hydroelectric) construction workplace, earning a grade B.

Skanska Burns McDonnell ECCO - CPV Valley: 1.5 TCR = 53% of Electricity generating plant (except hydroelectric) construction BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Skanska Burns McDonnell ECCO - CPV Valley safety composite

Skanska Burns McDonnell ECCO - CPV Valley scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.1

2016→2018

Skanska Burns McDonnell ECCO - CPV Valley injury rate improved

Skanska Burns McDonnell ECCO - CPV Valley's TCR fell 3.1 from 3.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.1 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.1 · 2017=1.4 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Middletown, NY AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.5 · 53% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #15/44
  • PHOTO Henkels & McCoy, Pen…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~286 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Henkels & McCoy, Pennsylvania - Blue Bell - Power (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Skanska Burns McDonnell ECCO - CPV Valley in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Skanska Burns McDonnell ECCO - CPV Valley averages 1.5 TCR (53% of the Electricity generating plant (except hydroelectric) construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Skanska Burns McDonnell ECCO - CPV Valley TCR series: 2016=3.1 · 2017=1.4 · 2018=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Skanska Burns McDonnell ECCO - CPV Valley falls in its industry

1,605 Electricity generating plant ( establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 44 Electricity generating plant ( employers in New York.

Skanska Burns McDonnell ECCO - CPV Valley (286 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Skanska Burns McDonnell ECCO - CPV Valley
Skanska Burns McDonnell ECCO - CPV Valley (286 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Skanska Burns McDonnell ECCO - CPV Valley has more employees than the Electricity generating plant (except hyd median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 1.4 0.0 7 0 0
2016 3.1 0.3 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · NY · Middletown

1,605 Electricity generating plant (except hydroelectric) construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 124 employers in Middletown, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Henkels & McCoy, Pennsylvania - Blue Bell - Power 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR MasTec Utility Services, LLC 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Field Services Division 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR LEM Marshalltown 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE W&W STEEL ERECTORS, LLC. 286 FTE
STATE-SIZE MB Food Processing, Inc 286 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kraft Heinz 286 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ivoclar Vivadent, Inc. 286 FTE
CITY-NEAR NY-05 4,926 FTE
CITY-NEAR ORANGE REGIONAL MEDICAL 2,772 FTE
CITY-NEAR NY_Middletown_2 Industrial Dr_TW272320 497 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1959 427 FTE
NAT-TCR Portland Lab 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Thermo Fisher Scientific Frederick, MD (BID - Executive Way) 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Harrisburg Branch 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR John A Becker Company-Cincinnati 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Maxim Healthcare- Allentown 339 286 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clover Health Care 286 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nestle Waters North America Allentown East (NPL) 286 FTE
NAT-SIZE Colgate Tennessee 286 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.