Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction · Florida

Skanska USA Civil Southeast

Maitland, FL · ~347 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Skanska USA Civil Southeast runs at 91% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction workplace, earning a grade C.

Skanska USA Civil Southeast: 2.5 TCR = 91% of Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Skanska USA Civil Southeast safety composite

Skanska USA Civil Southeast scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.9

2021→2024

Skanska USA Civil Southeast injury rate improved

Skanska USA Civil Southeast's TCR fell 0.9 from 2.8 in 2021 to 1.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 3.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.45× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=2.8 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=3.7 · 2024=1.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Maitland, FL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.5 · 91% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #81/174
  • PHOTO Illinois Valley Paving
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 37 inj
  • SIZE ~347 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Illinois Valley Paving (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Skanska USA Civil Southeast in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Skanska USA Civil Southeast averages 2.5 TCR (91% of the Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Skanska USA Civil Southeast TCR series: 2021=2.8 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=3.7 · 2024=1.9 · BLS 2.8

Where Skanska USA Civil Southeast falls in its industry

4,078 Pavement, highway, road, stree establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #81 safest of 174 Pavement, highway, road, stree employers in Florida.

Skanska USA Civil Southeast (347 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Skanska USA Civil Southeast
Skanska USA Civil Southeast (347 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Skanska USA Civil Southeast has more employees than the Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.9 1.1 5 0 0
2023 3.7 0.3 13 0 0
2022 1.8 0.0 7 0 0
2021 2.8 1.4 12 0 1

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · FL · Maitland

4,078 Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 61 employers in Maitland, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Illinois Valley Paving 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wildcat Construction Co., Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Defoe Corporation 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR C.W. Roberts Contracting Plant City Division 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ocala LG 347 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1225 347 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 778 347 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 5964 347 FTE
CITY-NEAR SLA Management 1,445 FTE
CITY-NEAR Location 19038 1,039 FTE
CITY-NEAR FL_Maitland_485 North Keller Road_CF620127 867 FTE
CITY-NEAR Program 017 - Central Florida 838 FTE
NAT-TCR 058 - Sawmill Rd Columbus 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 106 - Englewood 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 144 - Lancaster 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 198 - Bloomingdale 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE double kwik Elkhorn City 347 FTE
NAT-SIZE UR Medicine Home Care, Certified Services Inc. 347 FTE
NAT-SIZE double kwik Allen 347 FTE
NAT-SIZE A&B Process Systems Corp 347 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.