Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, ocean wave, solar, wind) structure construction · Tennessee

Skyhawk Solar Project

Name: Skyhawk Solar Project Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Union, TN · ~50 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

A
Excellent Safety Record: 0.4
Avg TCR: 2.8
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Skyhawk Solar Project runs at 14% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, ocean wave, solar, wind) structure construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Skyhawk Solar Project: 0.4 TCR = 14% of Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, ocean wave, solar, wind) structure construction BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Skyhawk Solar Project safety composite

Skyhawk Solar Project scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): A 0.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers
DART rate: B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.8

2022→2023

Skyhawk Solar Project injury rate improved

Skyhawk Solar Project's TCR fell 0.8 from 0.8 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 0.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=0.8 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Union, TN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 14% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #3/26
PHOTO Source Power LLC
BOOK 2y book
INJ 1 inj
SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Source Power LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

This site

0.4
Source Power L

0.4
Echo Powerline

0.4
Allied Power S

0.4
NA-US-MA-South

0.4

What this shows Skyhawk Solar Project averages 0.4 TCR (14% of the Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, ocean wave, solar, wind) structure construction BLS benchmark).

Skyhawk Solar Project TCR series: 2022=0.8 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Skyhawk Solar Project falls in its industry

1,605 Alternative energy (e.g., geot establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

Grade A

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 26 Alternative energy (e.g., geot employers in Tennessee.

Skyhawk Solar Project (50 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Skyhawk Solar Project has fewer employees than the Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, oc median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2023	0.0	0.0	0	0	0
2022	0.8	0.8	1	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · TN · Union

1,605 Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, ocean wave, solar, wind) structure construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Source Power LLC	SAN ANTONIO, TX	0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Echo Powerline LLC	BUNKIE, LA	0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Allied Power Services - DTE, Fermi Station	NEWPORT, MI	0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR	NA-US-MA-South Dennis-Western Boulevard	SOUTH DENNIS, MA	0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Memphis Greenhouse	MEMPHIS	50 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Winchester Utility System	WINCHESTER	50 FTE
STATE-SIZE	W. R. Newman & Associates, Inc.	NASHVILLE	50 FTE
STATE-SIZE	P&C Construction	CHATTANOOGA	50 FTE
NAT-TCR	Triangle Services - Phoenix Route Operation	Phoenix, AZ	0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR	Henry's Plumbing	Owensboro, KY	0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR	Saalex Solutions	Camarillo, CA	0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR	MFG-Augusta, GA-USA	Evans, GA	0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Altmann Construction Company Inc.	Wisconsin Rapids, WI	50 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Amac Enterprises, Inc.	Parma, OH	50 FTE
NAT-SIZE	H & H Foradory Construction, Inc.	Austin, TX	50 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Tilden Community Center	Hastings, MN	50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.