Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities · Utah

SLC Day Program

Midvale, UT · ~26 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

SLC Day Program runs at 157% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities workplace, earning a grade D.

SLC Day Program: 6.0 TCR = 157% of Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

SLC Day Program safety composite

SLC Day Program scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

SLC Day Program: 0.0 → 12.4 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 17.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.56× in 2024

SLC Day Program's TCR rose 12.4 from 0.0 in 2019 to 12.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 17.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.56× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Midvale, UT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.0 · 157% of ind

  • DART 9.3 DART
  • RANK #2/5
  • PHOTO Main/Central
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Main/Central (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Utah employers → · Look up another →

SLC Day Program in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows SLC Day Program averages 6.0 TCR (157% of the Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

SLC Day Program TCR series: 2019=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=17.4 · 2023=0 · 2024=12.4 · BLS 3.8

Where SLC Day Program falls in its industry

1,320 Activity centers for disabled establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Utah alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 5 Activity centers for disabled employers in Utah.

SLC Day Program (26 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate SLC Day Program
SLC Day Program (26 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

SLC Day Program has fewer employees than the Activity centers for disabled persons, t median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 12.4 9.3 4 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 17.4 17.4 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · UT · Midvale

1,320 Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,861 rated employers in Utah with headcount on file · 53 employers in Midvale, UT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Main/Central 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR VES - ADP&ILS 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hope Community Resources, Inc. 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Centennial DT 5.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Deseret Land and Livestock 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE FARM 42104 SOW -EST 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE RICHFIELD 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jordanelle Water Reclamation Facility 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR CHG Healthcare 3,847 FTE
CITY-NEAR Savage Services 3,796 FTE
CITY-NEAR CHG-Staff Employees 2,582 FTE
CITY-NEAR Peace Coliseum 645 FTE
NAT-TCR Bourns, Inc. - Logan, UT 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 1372 - Thornton 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 2137 - Atlanta Midtown 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Southern Tier Provisions 6.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lmmm Dallas #42, LTD. 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Becker 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE G & R Concrete, Inc. 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Covington 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.