Trucking, specialized freight (except used goods), local · Arizona

Smd Logistics, Inc

Somerton, AZ · ~25 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.7
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Smd Logistics, Inc runs at 171% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Trucking, specialized freight (except used goods), local workplace, earning a grade D.

Smd Logistics, Inc: 7.7 TCR = 171% of Trucking, specialized freight (except used goods), local BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Smd Logistics, Inc safety composite

Smd Logistics, Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−333.1

2016→2024

Smd Logistics, Inc injury rate improved

Smd Logistics, Inc's TCR fell 333.1 from 347.4 in 2016 to 14.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 347.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=347.4 · 2017=10.4 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=6.5 · 2020=6.8 · 2021=7.4 · 2022=7.9 · 2023=8.3 · 2024=14.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484220 · Somerton, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 7.7 · 171% of ind

  • DART 10.7 DART
  • RANK #15/17
  • PHOTO ConsTrucks Inc
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ConsTrucks Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Smd Logistics, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Smd Logistics, Inc averages 7.7 TCR (171% of the Trucking, specialized freight (except used goods), local BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Smd Logistics, Inc TCR series: 2016=347.4 · 2017=10.4 · 2018=0 · 2019=6.5 · 2020=6.8 · 2021=7.4 · 2022=7.9 · 2023=8.3 · 2024=14.3 · BLS 4.5

Where Smd Logistics, Inc falls in its industry

1,130 Trucking, specialized freight establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 17 Trucking, specialized freight employers in Arizona.

Smd Logistics, Inc (25 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Smd Logistics, Inc
Smd Logistics, Inc (25 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Smd Logistics, Inc has fewer employees than the Trucking, specialized freight (except us median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 14.3 10.7 4 0 0
2023 8.3 4.1 2 0 0
2022 7.9 4.0 1 1 0
2021 7.4 7.4 2 0 0
2020 6.8 6.8 2 0 0
2019 6.5 3.3 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 10.4 5.2 4 0 0
2016 347.4 104.2 9 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484220 · AZ · Somerton

1,130 Trucking, specialized freight (except used goods), local employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 12 employers in Somerton, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ConsTrucks Inc 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Farm Boy Trucking 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 089 Hodgkins IL 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 070 Doraville GA 7.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Camelot Nurseries, Inc. 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cholla Livestock 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE 7892_18701 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Arlington Valley, LLC 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR FRESH HARVEST, INC. - Arizona 427 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riverside Ag Works LLC 406 FTE
CITY-NEAR FRESH HARVEST, INC 232 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brothers Harvesting Inc 148 FTE
NAT-TCR Oak Creek Yard 717 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Penn-Troy 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Valu Home Center #18 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Enterprise Rent-A-Car (Tallahassee - 554R) 7.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tiff's Treats - A8 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Metro Hardwood Sioux Falls 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Prunty Construction Company, Inc. 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Paxton cincinnati 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.