Die-cut paper products for office use made from purchased paper or paperboard · Utah

Smead Manufacturing Company

Cedar City, UT · ~134 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Smead Manufacturing Company runs at 163% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Die-cut paper products for office use made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade D.

Smead Manufacturing Company: 5.4 TCR = 163% of Die-cut paper products for office use made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Smead Manufacturing Company safety composite

Smead Manufacturing Company scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Smead Manufacturing Company: 1.8 → 6.7 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 9.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.24× in 2022

Smead Manufacturing Company's TCR rose 4.8 from 1.8 in 2017 to 6.7 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 9.1 TCR. In 2022, DART was 1.24× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322230 · Cedar City, UT ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.4 · 163% of ind

  • DART 6.7 DART
  • RANK P13
  • PHOTO Association for Visi…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 39 inj
  • SIZE ~134 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Association for Vision Rehabilitation and Employment - Binghamton (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Utah employers → · Look up another →

Smead Manufacturing Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Smead Manufacturing Company averages 5.4 TCR (163% of the Die-cut paper products for office use made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Smead Manufacturing Company TCR series: 2017=1.8 · 2018=9.1 · 2019=4.1 · 2020=6 · 2021=4.6 · 2022=6.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Smead Manufacturing Company falls in its industry

122 Die-cut paper products for off establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Smead Manufacturing Company (134 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Smead Manufacturing Company
Smead Manufacturing Company (134 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Smead Manufacturing Company has more employees than the Die-cut paper products for office use ma median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 6.7 6.7 9 0 0
2021 4.6 4.6 7 0 0
2020 6.0 4.8 5 0 0
2019 4.1 2.7 6 0 0
2018 9.1 8.2 10 0 0
2017 1.8 1.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322230 · UT · Cedar City

122 Die-cut paper products for office use made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,861 rated employers in Utah with headcount on file · 56 employers in Cedar City, UT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Association for Vision Rehabilitation and Employment - Binghamton 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR SupremeX Midwest 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR East Coast Envelope & Graphics, LLC 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Double Envelope of Florida 5.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Malnove Incorporated of Utah 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rockwell Collins Simulation and training llc 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE Specialized Bicycle Components 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE 49361W - WEST VALLEY PLANT 134 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1438 554 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cedar City Hospital 479 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cedar City Office 428 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1438 425 FTE
NAT-TCR PSSI - 0018 Stampede Meat Inc. - Bridgeview 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Leesburg Al 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Fiesta Tortillas 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Dunagan Door by Franklin Building Supply 5.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Krapf Coaches Inc. 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE ECR International 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE 596 - La Habra 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE PSSI - 0300 Tyson Foods Inc.- Logansport 134 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.