Special purpose highway vehicle (e.g., firefighting vehicles) assembling on purchased chassis · Nebraska

Smeal Fire Apparatus Neligh

Neligh, NE · ~24 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Smeal Fire Apparatus Neligh runs at 261% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Special purpose highway vehicle (e.g., firefighting vehicles) assembling on purchased chassis workplace, earning a grade F.

Smeal Fire Apparatus Neligh: 8.6 TCR = 261% of Special purpose highway vehicle (e.g., firefighting vehicles) assembling on purchased chassis BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Smeal Fire Apparatus Neligh safety composite

Smeal Fire Apparatus Neligh scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−25.9

2016→2018

Smeal Fire Apparatus Neligh injury rate improved

Smeal Fire Apparatus Neligh's TCR fell 25.9 from 25.9 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 25.9 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=25.9 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336211 · Neligh, NE ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.6 · 261% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/4
  • PHOTO Delaco Kasle Process…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Delaco Kasle Processing (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nebraska employers → · Look up another →

Smeal Fire Apparatus Neligh in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Smeal Fire Apparatus Neligh averages 8.6 TCR (261% of the Special purpose highway vehicle (e.g., firefighting vehicles) assembling on purchased chassis BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Smeal Fire Apparatus Neligh TCR series: 2016=25.9 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Smeal Fire Apparatus Neligh falls in its industry

470 Special purpose highway vehicl establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nebraska alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 4 Special purpose highway vehicl employers in Nebraska.

Smeal Fire Apparatus Neligh (24 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 87 employees and a TCR of 5.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Smeal Fire Apparatus Neligh
Smeal Fire Apparatus Neligh (24 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 87 employees and a TCR of 5.5

Smeal Fire Apparatus Neligh has fewer employees than the Special purpose highway vehicle (e.g., f median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 25.9 8.6 4 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336211 · NE · Neligh

470 Special purpose highway vehicle (e.g., firefighting vehicles) assembling on purchased chassis employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,594 rated employers in Nebraska with headcount on file · 5 employers in Neligh, NE · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Delaco Kasle Processing 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR C.H. Bradshaw Company 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4645_12671 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR KNAPHEIDE TRUCK EQUIPMENT COMPANY BUDA 8.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Walther Farms NE 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE JSMM Farms Elgin 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schwartz Farms Pheasant Ridge NE 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bartlett Repro 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR Antelope Memorial Hospital 168 FTE
CITY-NEAR Arbor Care Center-Neligh 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Willows Assisted Living 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aurora Cooperative - Neligh Agronomy 19 FTE
NAT-TCR Massco - Wichita 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Jackson Emc - Gainesville 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 550 ABC Supply Co., inc. 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 0056 - Albuquerque, Nm 8.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE 993 Miami DC 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Linde - Cherokee 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Roses 392 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE KFC-Mililani #033 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.