Commercial building construction general contractors · Kansas

Smith Construction Co., Inc.

Wichita, KS · ~23 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Smith Construction Co., Inc. runs at 68% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Commercial building construction general contractors workplace, earning a grade B.

Smith Construction Co., Inc.: 2.0 TCR = 68% of Commercial building construction general contractors BLS 2.9 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Smith Construction Co., Inc. safety composite

Smith Construction Co., Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.9

2016→2019

Smith Construction Co., Inc. injury rate improved

Smith Construction Co., Inc.'s TCR fell 3.9 from 3.9 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.9 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.9 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Wichita, KS AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 68% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #18/63
  • PHOTO Boro Developers, Inc…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Boro Developers, Inc. d/b/a Boro Construction (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kansas employers → · Look up another →

Smith Construction Co., Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Smith Construction Co., Inc. averages 2.0 TCR (68% of the Commercial building construction general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Smith Construction Co., Inc. TCR series: 2016=3.9 · 2019=0 · BLS 2.9

Where Smith Construction Co., Inc. falls in its industry

4,692 Commercial building constructi establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 63 Commercial building constructi employers in Kansas.

Smith Construction Co., Inc. (23 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Smith Construction Co., Inc.
Smith Construction Co., Inc. (23 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Smith Construction Co., Inc. has fewer employees than the Commercial building construction general median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 3.9 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · KS · Wichita

4,692 Commercial building construction general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,228 rated employers in Kansas with headcount on file · 841 employers in Wichita, KS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Boro Developers, Inc. d/b/a Boro Construction 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Construction 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wolf Creek Contracting 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR JCI Contractors, Inc. 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cobalt Cattle Company LLC - Corporate 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Syracuse Feedyard 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Steven Cox Associates 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Heinen Brothers Ag - Office 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Spirit Aerosystems 11,775 FTE
CITY-NEAR Textron Aviation - Mid Continent 4,359 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wesley Medical Center 2,657 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1855-KSWIC062 2,438 FTE
NAT-TCR Classic Graphics, LLC - Morrisville 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Lorain Family Health Center & Surgery Center 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Northeast Arkansas Motors Inc DBA Honda of Jonesboro 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 829 - Newark 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE IHG Army Hotels - Redstone Arsenal (Candlewood Suites/Army Lodging) 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Show Low 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Town of Hinesburg 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Davis Delivery Service Inc. 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.