For-sale builders (i.e., building on own land, for sale), residential · Tennessee

Smith Douglas Nashville

Franklin, TN · ~38 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Smith Douglas Nashville runs at 46% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical For-sale builders (i.e., building on own land, for sale), residential workplace, earning a grade A.

Smith Douglas Nashville: 1.8 TCR = 46% of For-sale builders (i.e., building on own land, for sale), residential BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Smith Douglas Nashville safety composite

Smith Douglas Nashville scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Smith Douglas Nashville: 0.0 → 3.1 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 3.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2023

Smith Douglas Nashville's TCR rose 3.1 from 0.0 in 2020 to 3.1 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 3.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236117 · Franklin, TN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.8 · 46% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/4
  • PHOTO SMITH DOUGLAS REALTY
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SMITH DOUGLAS REALTY (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Smith Douglas Nashville in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Smith Douglas Nashville averages 1.8 TCR (46% of the For-sale builders (i.e., building on own land, for sale), residential BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Smith Douglas Nashville TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=3.9 · 2022=0 · 2023=3.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Smith Douglas Nashville falls in its industry

341 For-sale builders (i.e., build establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 4 For-sale builders (i.e., build employers in Tennessee.

Smith Douglas Nashville (38 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 79 employees and a TCR of 1.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Smith Douglas Nashville
Smith Douglas Nashville (38 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 79 employees and a TCR of 1.7

Smith Douglas Nashville has fewer employees than the For-sale builders (i.e., building on own median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.1 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.9 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236117 · TN · Franklin

341 For-sale builders (i.e., building on own land, for sale), residential employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 181 employers in Franklin, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SMITH DOUGLAS REALTY 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lennar Portland 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oyhut Development Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lennar San Antonio 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE D.R. Horton, Inc. - Memphis 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE J.A. Fielden Co, Inc. 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Messer Construction - Knoxville, TN 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lee Adcock Construction Co., Inc. 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR Williamson County Board of Education - Williamson County Schools 6,320 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nissan Americas Headquarters - Franklin 2,007 FTE
CITY-NEAR Williamson County Government 1,948 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lee Company 1,716 FTE
NAT-TCR Wieser Brothers General Contractor, Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR JTECH 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Maruka Lee's Summit 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR McComb Dirt Cheap 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Loffredo Fresh Foods - KC 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tri Tank Corporation 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plymouth 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Malteurop Winona 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.