Structural steel erecting or iron work contractors · South Carolina

Smith Engineering and Construction

Duncan, Sc, SC · ~56 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Smith Engineering and Construction runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Structural steel erecting or iron work contractors workplace, earning a grade C.

Smith Engineering and Construction: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Structural steel erecting or iron work contractors BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Smith Engineering and Construction safety composite

Smith Engineering and Construction scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Smith Engineering and Construction held a steady TCR band

Smith Engineering and Construction's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 0.0 TCR.

2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238120 · Duncan, Sc, SC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/5
  • PHOTO Great Lakes Tower & …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~56 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Great Lakes Tower & Antenna Co., Inc. (0.3 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Smith Engineering and Construction in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Smith Engineering and Construction averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Structural steel erecting or iron work contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Smith Engineering and Construction TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Smith Engineering and Construction falls in its industry

705 Structural steel erecting or i establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 5 Structural steel erecting or i employers in South Carolina.

Smith Engineering and Construction (56 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Smith Engineering and Construction
Smith Engineering and Construction (56 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Smith Engineering and Construction has fewer employees than the Structural steel erecting or iron work c median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238120 · SC · Duncan, Sc

705 Structural steel erecting or iron work contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Great Lakes Tower & Antenna Co., Inc. 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Main Office 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Conroe High 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Starko Inc./ACR Construction 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lockhart Power Company 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Construction Professionals Inc 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Spartanburg Water Customer Service 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kent Companies South Carolina Office 56 FTE
NAT-TCR TXC101551 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR EPIC Tampa 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Putzel Electrical Contractors, Inc. 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Pitman Glass Company 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE CDMX Logistics LLC 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE PromoMatting Division @ Americo Manufacturing 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bayonne Drydock and Repair Corp. 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Winston-Salem NC 56 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.