Structural steel erecting or iron work contractors · South Carolina

Smith Engineering & Construction, LLC

Duncan, SC · ~65 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Smith Engineering & Construction, LLC runs at 36% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Structural steel erecting or iron work contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

Smith Engineering & Construction, LLC: 1.0 TCR = 36% of Structural steel erecting or iron work contractors BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Smith Engineering & Construction, LLC safety composite

Smith Engineering & Construction, LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Smith Engineering & Construction, LLC: 0.0 → 2.0 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 2.0 TCR · DART/TCR 2× in 2019

Smith Engineering & Construction, LLC's TCR rose 2.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 2.0 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238120 · Duncan, SC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 36% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #1/5
  • PHOTO Moen Steel Erection …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~65 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Moen Steel Erection Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Smith Engineering & Construction, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Smith Engineering & Construction, LLC averages 1.0 TCR (36% of the Structural steel erecting or iron work contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Smith Engineering & Construction, LLC TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=2 · BLS 2.8

Where Smith Engineering & Construction, LLC falls in its industry

705 Structural steel erecting or i establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 5 Structural steel erecting or i employers in South Carolina.

Smith Engineering & Construction, LLC (65 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Smith Engineering & Construction, LLC
Smith Engineering & Construction, LLC (65 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Smith Engineering & Construction, LLC has more employees than the Structural steel erecting or iron work c median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238120 · SC · Duncan

705 Structural steel erecting or iron work contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 104 employers in Duncan, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Moen Steel Erection Inc. 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR CP Rebar & Installation,LLC 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR MA Rebar Services 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Schmueser & Associates - Henderson, Nevada 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE D.R. Horton, Inc. - Hilton Head Savannah 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pyramid Contracting LLC 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE E A Sween Company-Hodges 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lancaster Facility 65 FTE
CITY-NEAR Draexlmaier Automotive 981 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lear Corporation - Duncan 550 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fehrer Automotive SC, LLC 521 FTE
CITY-NEAR Roechling Automotive / Duncan 393 FTE
NAT-TCR Arconic Fastening Systems-City of Industry 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Worly Plumbing Supply, Inc. - Cincinnati 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Louisville Plantside 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Honeywell Electronic Chemicals - Chandler 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Greene Lumber Co. L.P. 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Thoma-Sea Marine Contructors Repair Yard 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE King's Construction Co Inc 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Edgerton Elementary School 65 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.