Tank cleaning and disposal services, commercial or industrial · Alabama

Smith Industrial Services

Mobile, AL · ~351 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Smith Industrial Services runs at 33% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Tank cleaning and disposal services, commercial or industrial workplace, earning a grade A.

Smith Industrial Services: 0.9 TCR = 33% of Tank cleaning and disposal services, commercial or industrial BLS 2.6 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Smith Industrial Services safety composite

Smith Industrial Services scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Smith Industrial Services held a steady TCR band

Smith Industrial Services's TCR held near 0.1 from 0.8 in 2016 to 0.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 1.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.8 · 2017=0.7 · 2018=0.9 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=0.8 · 2021=0.8 · 2022=0.9 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=0.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562998 · Mobile, AL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 33% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #3/4
  • PHOTO Pipeline Video Inspe…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~351 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pipeline Video Inspection, LLC dba AIMS Companies (Southern Hydrovac) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Smith Industrial Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Smith Industrial Services averages 0.9 TCR (33% of the Tank cleaning and disposal services, commercial or industrial BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Smith Industrial Services TCR series: 2016=0.8 · 2017=0.7 · 2018=0.9 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=0.8 · 2021=0.8 · 2022=0.9 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=0.9 · BLS 2.6

Where Smith Industrial Services falls in its industry

121 Tank cleaning and disposal ser establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 4 Tank cleaning and disposal ser employers in Alabama.

Smith Industrial Services (351 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Smith Industrial Services
Smith Industrial Services (351 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Smith Industrial Services has more employees than the Tank cleaning and disposal services, com median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.9 0.9 4 0 0
2023 1.3 1.1 6 0 0
2022 0.9 0.9 4 0 0
2021 0.8 0.3 3 0 0
2020 0.8 0.8 3 0 0
2019 0.8 0.8 3 0 0
2018 0.9 0.6 3 0 0
2017 0.7 0.4 2 0 0
2016 0.8 0.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562998 · AL · Mobile

121 Tank cleaning and disposal services, commercial or industrial employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 505 employers in Mobile, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pipeline Video Inspection, LLC dba AIMS Companies (Southern Hydrovac) 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Allstate Power Vac Inc. - Brooklyn Service Center 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Spike Enterprise, Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Coral Marine Services, LLC 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Borgers US 351 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mobile Call Center 351 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alatrade-Boaz 350 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 4318 352 FTE
CITY-NEAR MOBILE PACKERS 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR Austal USA LLC 3,377 FTE
CITY-NEAR MOBILE INFIRMARY 2,116 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hargrove Engineers and Constructors 1,949 FTE
NAT-TCR TC Construction, Inc. 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Otis Elevator Company-Puerto Rico 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Otis Elevator Company-Jacksonville 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Carrier Commercial Services (Sacramento) 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Royal Metal Products 351 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hoboken 351 FTE
NAT-SIZE Carroll Fulmer Logistics 351 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cook Inlet Tribal Council 351 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.