Refuse collection services · Oklahoma

Smithey Environmental Services, LLC

Tulsa, OK · ~47 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.2
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Smithey Environmental Services, LLC runs at 163% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Refuse collection services workplace, earning a grade D.

Smithey Environmental Services, LLC: 4.2 TCR = 163% of Refuse collection services BLS 2.6 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Smithey Environmental Services, LLC safety composite

Smithey Environmental Services, LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.6

2016→2024

Smithey Environmental Services, LLC injury rate improved

Smithey Environmental Services, LLC's TCR fell 2.6 from 2.6 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 12.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.6 · 2017=12.4 · 2018=6.1 · 2019=6.0 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=3.0 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562111 · Tulsa, OK ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.2 · 163% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #15/23
  • PHOTO S03024 - Cleveland H…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: S03024 - Cleveland Hauling (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oklahoma employers → · Look up another →

Smithey Environmental Services, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Smithey Environmental Services, LLC averages 4.2 TCR (163% of the Refuse collection services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Smithey Environmental Services, LLC TCR series: 2016=2.6 · 2017=12.4 · 2018=6.1 · 2019=6 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=3 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.6

Where Smithey Environmental Services, LLC falls in its industry

2,322 Refuse collection services establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oklahoma alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 23 Refuse collection services employers in Oklahoma.

Smithey Environmental Services, LLC (47 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Smithey Environmental Services, LLC
Smithey Environmental Services, LLC (47 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Smithey Environmental Services, LLC has fewer employees than the Refuse collection services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2022 3.0 3.0 2 0 0
2021 2.9 2.9 2 0 0
2020 3.9 3.9 2 0 0
2019 6.0 4.0 3 0 0
2018 6.1 0.0 2 0 1
2017 12.4 12.4 4 0 0
2016 2.6 2.6 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562111 · OK · Tulsa

2,322 Refuse collection services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,320 rated employers in Oklahoma with headcount on file · 1,004 employers in Tulsa, OK · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR S03024 - Cleveland Hauling 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR S03030 - Chillicothe Hauling 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Steve's Sanitation 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nevada Compactor Maintenacne 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE ProPetro Services -- Mid-Continent Division 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gateway Services Group 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Petroleum Marketers Equipment Co., LLC 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Klaver Construction Co., Inc. 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Francis Hospital, Inc. 6,668 FTE
CITY-NEAR H&P IDC - U.S. Land 6,014 FTE
CITY-NEAR TUL-TULSA-MAINTENANCE BASE 5,184 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-TUL-TULSA-TUL-TRML 4,794 FTE
NAT-TCR Deseret Meat 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Super Giant Landover 308 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Giant 388 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Giant Food Stores 6262 4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Global Stone and Tile, LLC 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Agrati Inc 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Neighborhood Co-op 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Servpro of Effingham Mattoon Charleston 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.