General public administration · Washington

Snohomish County Government

Everett, WA · ~3,004 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.8
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Snohomish County Government runs at 181% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical General public administration workplace, earning a grade D.

Snohomish County Government: 5.8 TCR = 181% of General public administration BLS 3.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Snohomish County Government safety composite

Snohomish County Government scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.9

2017→2024

Snohomish County Government injury rate improved

Snohomish County Government's TCR fell 2.9 from 7.5 in 2017 to 4.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 7.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.46× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=7.5 · 2019=6.8 · 2020=4.8 · 2021=4.8 · 2023=6.1 · 2024=4.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921190 · Everett, WA ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade D · TCR 5.8 · 181% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #15/28
  • PHOTO Admin & Operations (…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 877 inj
  • SIZE ~3,004 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Admin & Operations (Bremerton) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Snohomish County Government in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Snohomish County Government averages 5.8 TCR (181% of the General public administration BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Snohomish County Government TCR series: 2017=7.5 · 2019=6.8 · 2020=4.8 · 2021=4.8 · 2023=6.1 · 2024=4.6 · BLS 3.2

Where Snohomish County Government falls in its industry

1,496 General public administration establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 28 General public administration employers in Washington.

Snohomish County Government (3,004 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Snohomish County Government
Snohomish County Government (3,004 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Snohomish County Government has more employees than the General public administration median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.6 2.6 132 4 0
2023 6.1 3.1 136 22 0
2021 4.8 2.4 113 11 0
2020 4.8 2.4 123 4 0
2019 6.8 3.5 183 1 0
2017 7.5 4.0 190 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921190 · WA · Everett

1,496 General public administration employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 271 employers in Everett, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Admin & Operations (Bremerton) 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Isabella County 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Chicago Dept of Assets, Information and Services - 900 E. 103rd St 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Chisago City 5.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : BFI4 2,994 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - BFI4 2,961 FTE
STATE-SIZE SHS, SMG 2,950 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2643-46080001-460801 3,061 FTE
CITY-NEAR WA004 31,034 FTE
CITY-NEAR WA660 EVERETT MEDICAL CTR COLBY-EVERETT HR 3,160 FTE
CITY-NEAR Snohomish County 2,851 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Everett 1,205 FTE
NAT-TCR Zero Zone, Inc.-Waukesha 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR TPI Humacao 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Pueblo Electrics Inc 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Hilltown Packing Co., Inc.-CA 5.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - SDF8 3,001 FTE
NAT-SIZE Henry Ford Macomb Hospital 3,007 FTE
NAT-SIZE North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : PDX9 3,009 FTE
NAT-SIZE Field Core : Field Core (US Only) 2,998 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.