Electric power generation, tidal · Washington

Snohomish County PUD #1 - Monroe

Monroe, WA · ~24 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.6
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Snohomish County PUD #1 - Monroe runs at 885% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electric power generation, tidal workplace, earning a grade F.

Snohomish County PUD #1 - Monroe: 10.6 TCR = 885% of Electric power generation, tidal BLS 1.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Snohomish County PUD #1 - Monroe safety composite

Snohomish County PUD #1 - Monroe scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.3

2023→2024

Snohomish County PUD #1 - Monroe injury rate improved

Snohomish County PUD #1 - Monroe's TCR fell 4.3 from 12.8 in 2023 to 8.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 12.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=12.8 · 2024=8.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221118 · Monroe, WA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.6 · 885% of ind

  • DART 4.2 DART
  • RANK #4/7
  • PHOTO Snohomish County PUD…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Snohomish County PUD #1 - Snohomish (0.5 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Snohomish County PUD #1 - Monroe in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Snohomish County PUD #1 - Monroe averages 10.6 TCR (885% of the Electric power generation, tidal BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Snohomish County PUD #1 - Monroe TCR series: 2023=12.8 · 2024=8.5 · BLS 1.2

Where Snohomish County PUD #1 - Monroe falls in its industry

84 Electric power generation, tid establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 7 Electric power generation, tid employers in Washington.

Snohomish County PUD #1 - Monroe (24 employees, TCR 10.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Snohomish County PUD #1 - Monroe
Snohomish County PUD #1 - Monroe (24 employees, TCR 10.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Snohomish County PUD #1 - Monroe has fewer employees than the Electric power generation, tidal median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.5 4.2 1 1 0
2023 12.8 0.0 2 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221118 · WA · Monroe

84 Electric power generation, tidal employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 48 employers in Monroe, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Snohomish County PUD #1 - Snohomish 11.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Snohomish County PUD #1 - Arlington 12.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Marquette Board of Light & Power 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Snohomish County PUD #1 - Lake Stevens 8.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Krainick Dairy LLC 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE View Point Dairy 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pacific Shellfish Grays Harbor LLC 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Olympia Yard 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR Canyon Creek Cabinet Company 353 FTE
CITY-NEAR Headquarters 344 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 5628 306 FTE
CITY-NEAR 701-00210 295 FTE
NAT-TCR Corlett Turner 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 305 Bellingham 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Bridge Home Health Central Coast, LLC 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Alamo Heights 10.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Aeromat Plastics 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE CBSI Hagerstown 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE New England Gypsum Manchester 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Karpp Boston 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.