Structural steel erecting or iron work contractors · California

So-Cal Structural Steel Fabrication, Inc.

Rialto, CA · ~47 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.2
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

So-Cal Structural Steel Fabrication, Inc. runs at 328% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Structural steel erecting or iron work contractors workplace, earning a grade F.

So-Cal Structural Steel Fabrication, Inc.: 9.2 TCR = 328% of Structural steel erecting or iron work contractors BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

So-Cal Structural Steel Fabrication, Inc. safety composite

So-Cal Structural Steel Fabrication, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2017→2024

So-Cal Structural Steel Fabrication, Inc. injury rate improved

So-Cal Structural Steel Fabrication, Inc.'s TCR fell 1.0 from 7.2 in 2017 to 6.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 15.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.34× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=7.2 · 2022=8.0 · 2023=15.4 · 2024=6.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238120 · Rialto, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.2 · 328% of ind

  • DART 3.1 DART
  • RANK #84/96
  • PHOTO Mahaney Steel
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mahaney Steel (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

So-Cal Structural Steel Fabrication, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows So-Cal Structural Steel Fabrication, Inc. averages 9.2 TCR (328% of the Structural steel erecting or iron work contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

So-Cal Structural Steel Fabrication, Inc. TCR series: 2017=7.2 · 2022=8 · 2023=15.4 · 2024=6.2 · BLS 2.8

Where So-Cal Structural Steel Fabrication, Inc. falls in its industry

705 Structural steel erecting or i establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #84 safest of 96 Structural steel erecting or i employers in California.

So-Cal Structural Steel Fabrication, Inc. (47 employees, TCR 9.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate So-Cal Structural Steel Fabrication, Inc.
So-Cal Structural Steel Fabrication, Inc. (47 employees, TCR 9.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9

So-Cal Structural Steel Fabrication, Inc. has fewer employees than the Structural steel erecting or iron work c median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.2 3.1 2 0 0
2023 15.4 15.4 6 0 0
2022 8.0 6.0 4 0 0
2017 7.2 7.2 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238120 · CA · Rialto

705 Structural steel erecting or iron work contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 133 employers in Rialto, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mahaney Steel 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR D&E Steel 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Main Michoud 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Western Pacific Precast, LLC 9.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bowles Farming Company,Inc. 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ruiz Farm Labor 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fresh Valley Harvesting, LLC. 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Timothy & Viguie C.S.V. 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : LGB7 4,143 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - LGB7 4,095 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - LGB8 2,705 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3806 - Rialto CA DC 1,822 FTE
NAT-TCR Jersey City Medical Center 9.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 1979 Marion 9.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Atrium Health Union 9.2 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Woodbury - Eagle Valley Golf Course 9.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Olivet - Plant 2 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oakwood Terrace 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Orange City 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hudson Construction Inc. 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.