Workshops for persons with disabilities · Oregon

SO Goodwill Southgate

Medford, OR · ~41 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

SO Goodwill Southgate runs at 317% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Workshops for persons with disabilities workplace, earning a grade F.

SO Goodwill Southgate: 12.0 TCR = 317% of Workshops for persons with disabilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

SO Goodwill Southgate safety composite

SO Goodwill Southgate scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

SO Goodwill Southgate: 10.1 → 12.0 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 24.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.75× in 2023

SO Goodwill Southgate's TCR rose 1.8 from 10.1 in 2017 to 12.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 24.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.75× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624310 · Medford, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.0 · 317% of ind

  • DART 9.0 DART
  • RANK #54/67
  • PHOTO WIB Nevada
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: WIB Nevada (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

SO Goodwill Southgate in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows SO Goodwill Southgate averages 12.0 TCR (317% of the Workshops for persons with disabilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

SO Goodwill Southgate TCR series: 2017=10.1 · 2019=24.5 · 2020=0 · 2021=13.2 · 2022=12.3 · 2023=12 · BLS 3.8

Where SO Goodwill Southgate falls in its industry

1,455 Workshops for persons with dis establishments

Safer than 10% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #54 safest of 67 Workshops for persons with dis employers in Oregon.

SO Goodwill Southgate (41 employees, TCR 12.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate SO Goodwill Southgate
SO Goodwill Southgate (41 employees, TCR 12.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

SO Goodwill Southgate has fewer employees than the Workshops for persons with disabilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 12.0 9.0 4 0 0
2022 12.3 12.3 5 0 0
2021 13.2 13.2 5 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 24.5 13.6 7 2 0
2017 10.1 6.8 2 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624310 · OR · Medford

1,455 Workshops for persons with disabilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 250 employers in Medford, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR WIB Nevada 12.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Buckhannon-Upshur Work Adjustment Center, Inc 12.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR BEACON LIGHTHOUSE INC 12.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1920 Dahlgren 12.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Schwope Brothers West Coast 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE JR Simplot Company-ZX Ranch 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Logging 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE LBA Contract Cutting Inc 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR Harry and David Operations Inc 2,116 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR343 PROVIDENCE MEDFORD MEDICAL CENTER HR 1,136 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000590 1,130 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lithia Motors Support Services 677 FTE
NAT-TCR Bryant Racing Inc 12.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Bodycote - Fountain Inn 12.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Blue Ridge Vista 12.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Consulate Health Care 12.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Willowbrook of Effingham 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lloyd Pest Control-SM 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE G-FAM, Corp dba Paul Davis Restoration of Boston South & Rhode Island 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Teknor Color Company - Kentucky 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.