Casino hotels · Michigan

Soaring Eagle Casino & Resort

Mt. Pleasant, MI · ~2,199 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.7
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Soaring Eagle Casino & Resort runs at 191% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Casino hotels workplace, earning a grade D.

Soaring Eagle Casino & Resort: 5.7 TCR = 191% of Casino hotels BLS 3.0 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Soaring Eagle Casino & Resort safety composite

Soaring Eagle Casino & Resort scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.8

2016→2024

Soaring Eagle Casino & Resort injury rate improved

Soaring Eagle Casino & Resort's TCR fell 2.8 from 7.4 in 2016 to 4.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 7.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.68× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.4 · 2017=5.8 · 2018=7.0 · 2019=6.8 · 2020=4.7 · 2021=5.6 · 2022=4.4 · 2023=5.5 · 2024=4.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721120 · Mt. Pleasant, MI ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade D · TCR 5.7 · 191% of ind

  • DART 3.9 DART
  • RANK #9/9
  • PHOTO DGMB Casino, LLC d/b…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 870 inj
  • SIZE ~2,199 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DGMB Casino, LLC d/b/a Resorts Casino Hotel (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Soaring Eagle Casino & Resort in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Soaring Eagle Casino & Resort averages 5.7 TCR (191% of the Casino hotels BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Soaring Eagle Casino & Resort TCR series: 2016=7.4 · 2017=5.8 · 2018=7 · 2019=6.8 · 2020=4.7 · 2021=5.6 · 2022=4.4 · 2023=5.5 · 2024=4.6 · BLS 3.0

Where Soaring Eagle Casino & Resort falls in its industry

381 Casino hotels establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 9 Casino hotels employers in Michigan.

Soaring Eagle Casino & Resort (2,199 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 725 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Soaring Eagle Casino & Resort
Soaring Eagle Casino & Resort (2,199 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 725 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Soaring Eagle Casino & Resort has more employees than the Casino hotels median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.6 3.9 70 0 0
2023 5.5 4.6 86 2 0
2022 4.4 3.2 69 0 0
2021 5.6 5.1 57 22 0
2020 4.7 3.9 58 6 0
2019 6.8 5.5 136 0 0
2018 7.0 5.3 135 5 0
2017 5.8 4.7 114 4 0
2016 7.4 6.2 145 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721120 · MI · Mt. Pleasant

381 Casino hotels employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 42 employers in Mt. Pleasant, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DGMB Casino, LLC d/b/a Resorts Casino Hotel 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Golden Nugget Cripple Creek 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR MGM Grand Hotel llc 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Circus Circus Las Vegas 5.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Henry Ford Wyandotte Hospital 2,219 FTE
STATE-SIZE Holland Hospital 2,177 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lakeland Medical Center 2,222 FTE
STATE-SIZE Henry Ford Wyandotte 2,232 FTE
CITY-NEAR McLaren Central Michigan 582 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delfield 463 FTE
CITY-NEAR J Ranck Electric, Inc. 298 FTE
CITY-NEAR Asplundh Tree Expert, LLC - 064 256 FTE
NAT-TCR 44 Durango 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Glendale Heights 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR The Fresh Market 190 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Fastrak Express,Inc. 5.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Alta Bates Summit Medical Center (213-OK-008) 2,199 FTE
NAT-SIZE Greenville County 2,200 FTE
NAT-SIZE Abbvie Inc. Irvine 2,198 FTE
NAT-SIZE BWXT NOG Lynchburg 2,200 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.