Food Service Contractors · New York

Sodexo at Amsterdam Harborside Dining

Port Washington, NY · ~98 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sodexo at Amsterdam Harborside Dining runs at 104% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Food Service Contractors workplace, earning a grade C.

Sodexo at Amsterdam Harborside Dining: 3.1 TCR = 104% of Food Service Contractors BLS 3.0 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sodexo at Amsterdam Harborside Dining safety composite

Sodexo at Amsterdam Harborside Dining scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.5

2018→2022

Sodexo at Amsterdam Harborside Dining injury rate improved

Sodexo at Amsterdam Harborside Dining's TCR fell 10.5 from 11.2 in 2018 to 0.7 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 11.2 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.23× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=11.2 · 2019=0.0 · 2021=0.7 · 2022=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722310 · Port Washington, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.1 · 104% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #275/524
  • PHOTO SODEXO AT YOUNG HARR…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~98 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SODEXO AT YOUNG HARRIS COLLEGE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Sodexo at Amsterdam Harborside Dining in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sodexo at Amsterdam Harborside Dining averages 3.1 TCR (104% of the Food Service Contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sodexo at Amsterdam Harborside Dining TCR series: 2018=11.2 · 2019=0 · 2021=0.7 · 2022=0.7 · BLS 3.0

Where Sodexo at Amsterdam Harborside Dining falls in its industry

6,952 Food Service Contractors establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #275 safest of 524 Food Service Contractors employers in New York.

Sodexo at Amsterdam Harborside Dining (98 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sodexo at Amsterdam Harborside Dining
Sodexo at Amsterdam Harborside Dining (98 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Sodexo at Amsterdam Harborside Dining has more employees than the Food Service Contractors median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2021 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 11.2 8.4 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722310 · NY · Port Washington

6,952 Food Service Contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 39 employers in Port Washington, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT YOUNG HARRIS COLLEGE 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT FED RESERVE BANK ST.LOUIS CAFE 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR TENNOVA LAFOLLETTE 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT ADVENTIST CASTLE MC ES 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Urban Atelier Group Main Office 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE Callahan Paving Corp. 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rovini Concrete Corp 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE URP main office 1300 BHTL Rd 98 FTE
CITY-NEAR The NPD Group, Inc. 549 FTE
CITY-NEAR LIF PORT WASHINGTON 369 FTE
CITY-NEAR Systemax/Global Industrial - Port Washington - NY 285 FTE
CITY-NEAR PW- Medical Depot, Inc. 262 FTE
NAT-TCR Powell Store 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Westfield Washington Sch Dst 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at W Windsor-Plainsboro Schools 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Reaves Inc 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE SM-FL-SMARR 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE El Super 4 - Cesar Chavez 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4765-ORDCW9828 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE el super #45 oceanside 98 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.